AI Rate Professor

Art

Paula Busch

ART8 · ART7 · ART8373 · ART77 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
39/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take her only if you can .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear InstructionsAdvanced ProjectsNice But Hands-OnUnfair GradingAttendance Penalties
  • Students and techniques are not explained enough.
  • The course can feel too advanced for beginners despite being presented as basic design.
  • Grading and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A looks uncertain because students mention , and attendance penalties.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The content is not beginner-friendly because projects feel advanced and technique instruction is limited.

Only in-person reviews describe the course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

because one student says points are lost for absences and tardies.

The .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Most students hesitate because .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Students report and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The workload is project-based and not described as huge, but vague expectations make it feel harder.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Teaching is weakened by unclear instructions, limited technique coverage, and inconsistent guidance.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews discuss art projects and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed but lean negative because students report , and .

Main concern

Students may need to handle vague instructions and limited technique coverage on their own.

What students said

“ ”
ART8373
“this class is pretty advanced and she doesnt give us a ”
ART7
“Grades a bit unfairly-in comparison rather than separate”
ART8

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-book, quiz, midterm, or final policies.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“this class is pretty advanced and she doesnt give us a ”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

42/100

“ ”

📈 Course Difficulty

38/100

“not quite a beginners class”

⚖️

30/100

“Grades a bit unfairly-in comparison rather than separate”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • techniques not covered much
  • She is a

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • this class is pretty advanced
  • not quite a beginners class
  • Lose pts for absence and tardies

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Four older in-person reviews give consistent concerns about clarity, but the sample is small.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ART71 review
ART771 review
ART81 review
ART83731 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values