AI Rate Professor

English

Tiffany Denman

M6026ENGLISH2 · ENGM621 · ENGLISH2 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
5/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

unless you are comfortable learning independently with minimal support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProBoring LecturesLittle HelpHarsh CriticismSelf-Taught RequiredAvoid If Needing Support
  • All reviews rate the experience very poorly and describe little instructional support.
  • Students say criticism is harsh and .
  • The class may only suit students who can work with almost no guidance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Getting an A looks very hard because students describe severe criticism, little help, and high difficulty.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course seems difficult mainly because students feel unsupported through major writing work.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students strongly discourage taking her because they found her boring, harsh, and unhelpful.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Students repeatedly describe criticism of their writing as severe and unhelpful.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The Frankenstein paper is described as high-effort with little support.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Every review describes the teaching as boring, unhelpful, and overly critical.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Reviews focus on papers and written work rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are consistently negative, citing boring teaching, harsh criticism, and little help.

Main concern

Students who need guidance may feel unsupported for the whole semester.

What students said

“not very helpfull and all she really is good at is critizing everyone's work”
M6026ENGLISH2
“we pretty much were on our own the whole semester”
ENGLISH2
“I would highly suggest another professor”
ENGM621

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-book, quiz, midterm, or final policies.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“we pretty much were on our own the whole semester”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“Teacher very boring and did not help at all”

⚖️

10/100

“all she really is good at is critizing everyone's work”

👍 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“I would highly suggest another professor”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Denman pretty boring teacher
  • Teacher very boring and did not help at all
  • Pretty boring too, just studied Frankenstein the who semester

Theme 2

📝

  • we pretty much were on our own the whole semester
  • not such a helpful teacher
  • basically criticize abilities and work

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

60/100

Evidence confidence

but very consistent in their negative assessment.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENGLISH21 review
ENGM6211 review
M6026ENGLISH21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values