AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Laura Smith

SUCK217 · MATH108 · MATH28 · MATH217 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you can handle inconsistent teaching and are comfortable learning math independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing math teacherPatient for some studentsConfusing lecturesUnhelpful when students struggleHigh frustration risk
  • Reviews are sharply split, with several students calling her caring and several calling her the .
  • The and weak .
  • There is little reliable evidence about grades, exams, or class presence.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Getting an A does not look easy because students report , and limited help.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The math content and homework that may not match class examples.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

so students have to show up, suggesting low attendance flexibility.

; there is no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Several students strongly warn against the class despite a few positive comments about patience and support.

All , and it is highly polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Reviews give little grade evidence, but complaints about grades and as generous.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

as a regular issue, but reviews do not prove an overwhelming workload.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Some students praise her patience, but the and poor support.

Format shift

All teaching evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

The , while exams are not clearly described.

Format shift

; online reviews do not exist.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are polarized, with strong praise for patience but and lack of help.

Main concern

.

What students said

“ and allows time to get extra help if needed.”
MATH217
“She doesn't give your grades doesn't help if .”
SUCK217
“what she taught in class was not always what was on the homework so it was a little difficult.”
MATH108

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching clarity, support, and course difficulty. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“She doesn't give your grades doesn't help if .”

👍 Recommendation Risk

30/100

“if mistake”

⚖️ Course Difficulty

35/100

“what she taught in class was not always what was on the homework so it was a little difficult.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she was awesome, she helped me so much and made class fun.
  • and allows time to get extra help if needed.
  • I think I know more math then she does if that answers your questions she is horrible teacher

Theme 2

📉 About Struggle and Support

  • She doesn't give your grades doesn't help if .
  • If you don't get how to do it her way to bad cuz she really doesn't care
  • what she taught in class was not always what was on the homework so it was a little difficult.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews give a usable pattern, but they are old, polarized, and .

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH2175 reviews
MATH1082 reviews
2172171 review
MATH281 review
SUCK2171 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values