AI Rate Professor

English

Michael Davis

ENGCRIT · ENG11 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want an engaging English class with and a fair but real writing load.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPassionate teacherOrganized lecturesHelpful and availableInteresting discussionsModerate writing workload
  • Students strongly praise his passion, organization, humor, and availability.
  • The class includes essays and reading, but students do not describe the workload as unreasonable.
  • The sample is small, so confidence is lower than the high ratings suggest.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

The grade seems fair for students who do the essays and reading, but comments do not support an effortless A.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The course has challenging topics, essays, and reading, but students say the discussions and teaching make it manageable.

, and they show moderate challenge with strong teaching support.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews , so flexibility cannot be proven.

, and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Students highly recommend him because , and makes discussions interesting.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

65/100

Reviews do not mention harsh grading, but essays and .

Format shift

in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The workload includes three essays and reading, but students call it not unreasonable and sometimes light.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students describe him as , and highly engaging.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is in-person only and consistently positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

The clearest assessment evidence is three essays and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are strongly positive, emphasizing organized lectures, passion, humor, and helpfulness.

Main concern

Expect essays and .

What students said

“Very passionate about his field.”
ENG11
“3 essays, some reading required.”
ENG11
“ , and .”
ENG11

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book status, or .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and recommendation strength. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“ , and .”

👍 Recommendation Level

94/100

“ !”

📚 Workload Balance

62/100

“Not an unreasonable amount of homework, 3 essays, some reading required.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Dr. Davis is a fantastic teacher.
  • Very passionate about his field.
  • Lectures are usually well orchestrated class discussions

Theme 2

📚 About Workload And Difficulty

  • Not an unreasonable amount of homework, 3 essays, some reading required.
  • the
  • Lots of bold and challenging topics that you wouldn't often evaluate.

Theme 3

👍 About Recommendation

  • !
  • i highly, highly reccommend him!!
  • Great instructor he freaken rocks!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only 4 older reviews are available, so the but evidence depth is limited.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG113 reviews
ENGCRIT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values