AI Rate Professor

Agriculture

Herbert Jacobson

AGS30 · APSAGS2 · EH30 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Take him if you want a approachable.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear LecturerPassionate ExpertHelpful HandoutsHighly RecommendedNo Expensive Textbook
  • Students consistently describe Herbert Jacobson as , and easy to understand.
  • The course can become technical, but students say his structure and help make it manageable.
  • Reviews strongly recommend taking him, especially for students open to learning about insects or agriculture.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

There is , and comments suggest the class is manageable but can require real effort when the material gets technical.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Students say the lectures are easy to understand, though one review says the coursework can be technical and challenging.

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and makes the subject engaging.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Reviews do not clearly describe grading leniency, so the harsh.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload does not sound overwhelming, but technical coursework means students should expect some real effort.

Format shift

coursework.

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

Students consistently praise his clarity, passion, organization, helpfulness, and ability to make the subject interesting.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove whether assessment .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and assessment structure is not clearly described.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are very positive, emphasizing , and approachable support.

Main concern

Some coursework can be technical and challenging.

What students said

“His lectures were easy to understand, he provided handouts that , and he did not require an expensive textbook.”
APSAGS2
“He has a and .”
AGS30
“He can be very techical when it comes to course work, will challenge you to do well.”
AGS30

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .J just to have him again as an instructor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, challenge, and recommendation strength. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

93/100

“His lectures were easy to understand, he provided handouts that , and he did not require an expensive textbook.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

95/100

“ ... !”

📚 Course Challenge

58/100

“He can be very techical when it comes to course work, will challenge you to do well.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Dr. , and informing.
  • His lectures were easy to understand, he provided handouts that , and he did not require an expensive textbook.
  • He has a and .

Theme 2

❤️ About Enthusiasm

  • But Dr.J made me love it.
  • He's a very passionate person.
  • He teaches cause he loves to.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Value

  • He can be very techical when it comes to course work, will challenge you to do well.
  • .J just to have him again as an instructor.
  • ... !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Four older reviews give consistent and fairly detailed praise, but the sample is small and .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

AGS302 reviews
APSAGS21 review
EH301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values