AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Jonathan Smith

NSG55 · NSG1 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
80/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

, but the evidence is too thin to promise an easy class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGood TeacherFun ClassPositive Experience
  • Both reviews are positive, but they are very brief.
  • Students describe Jonathan Smith as good, awesome, and fun.
  • Difficulty appears moderate to high, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

The difficulty ratings are fairly high and there is no comment evidence of .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course does not sound impossible, but difficulty ratings suggest it is not especially easy.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they provide little detail beyond positive teaching impressions.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Students sound positive about him, but the small and vague review set limits confidence.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

There is , and the higher difficulty ratings keep leniency below average.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, with no direct grading-policy comments.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload is not described, but the difficulty ratings suggest students should expect meaningful effort.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and workload is not directly discussed.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

The limited comments are positive and call him a good, awesome, and fun teacher.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove whether .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and assessment structure is not mentioned.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but short, mainly saying he is a good and fun teacher.

Main concern

The comments .

What students said

“Good teacher”
NSG1
“Jon was an awesome teacher! and alot of fun!”
NSG55

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Jon was an awesome teacher! and alot of fun!”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting the limited but positive teaching comments. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“Good teacher”

👍 Recommendation Signal

82/100

“Jon was an awesome teacher! and alot of fun!”

📈 Difficulty Signal

45/100

“Good teacher”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Good teacher
  • Jon was an awesome teacher! and alot of fun!

Theme 2

👍 About Student Experience

  • Good teacher
  • Jon was an awesome teacher! and alot of fun!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two old and , so the positive signal is weakly supported.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NSG11 review
NSG551 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values