AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Trish Reilly

NRSG000 · NSG2 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Consider taking her if you can handle a harder course, but the review evidence is too sparse for a strong recommendation.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerGreat TeacherHigh DifficultySparse Evidence
  • The only meaningful comment says Trish Reilly is a great teacher.
  • Both reviews have high difficulty ratings.
  • Evidence is very limited, with one review containing no real comment.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

High difficulty ratings and work.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The though one student calls her a great teacher.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they provide almost no detail beyond high difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

65/100

One student praises her teaching, but the thin evidence and high difficulty make the recommendation cautious.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

35/100

There is no direct grading evidence, but high .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, with .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Workload is not directly described, but high difficulty ratings suggest the course may feel demanding.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and workload is not directly discussed.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

The only substantive comment is positive, but the evidence is too sparse for a higher teaching score.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove whether assessment .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and assessment structure is not mentioned.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person evidence is positive about teaching but .

Main concern

The course appears difficult and reviews provide .

What students said

“Great teacher!”
NSG2
“No Comments”
NRSG000

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great teacher!”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting sparse teaching evidence and high difficulty ratings. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Great teacher!”

📈 Difficulty Signal

35/100

“Great teacher!”

⚠️ Evidence Limit

25/100

“No Comments”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great teacher!
  • No Comments

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Great teacher!
  • No Comments

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and one contains no substantive comment, so confidence is low.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NRSG0001 review
NSG21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values