AI Rate Professor

English

Colleen Harvel

LEAD219 · ENGL217 · ENG119 · ENGLISH2 · ENG219 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
73/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you will attend, ask for help, and do the writing work, but expect a structured class with mixed personality fit.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful when askedOrganizedMixed first impressionWork requiredFew or no tests
  • Most students praise her help, organization, and ability to teach English clearly.
  • Several reviews say students should attend and do the work to pass, so the class is not a free A.
  • One strongly negative review reports disorganization and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Passing seems realistic if you attend and do the work, but comments do not support a no-effort A.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

The class sounds manageable with help and organization, but English writing expectations can still challenge some students.

Only in-person reviews describe course easiness.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as important for passing, but reviews do not .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Most students recommend her because she is helpful and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Students say doing the work and attending leads to passing, but student.

Format shift

and paper expectations.

Workload

Light

74/100

One review reports only , and .

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most reviews describe her as , and knowledgeable, but and unhelpful.

Format shift

but not unanimous evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The and no tests or quizzes.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, with many students calling her helpful and organized, though one review is sharply negative.

Main concern

Some students find her expectations or .

What students said

“she will help you if needed and .”
ENG219
“ .”
LEAD219
“Only had 4 short papers. .”
ENG119

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The quizzes, making the assessment style student-friendly.

No Tests Or Quizzes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

85/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or quizzes, and reviews do not prove proctoring or book policies.

No Tests Or Quizzes
“Only had 4 short papers. .”
ENG119

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She seems very mean at first! But she is the ! She is so helpful, so kind and she knows how to teach a class!”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“She is so helpful, so kind and she knows how to teach a class!”

👍 Recommendation Level

76/100

“Great teacher. .”

📝 Workload And Exams

74/100

“Only had 4 short papers. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was a great teacher!
  • she will help you if needed and .
  • She is so helpful, so kind and she knows how to teach a class!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • go to all classes and you will pass.
  • if you do the work you will pass!
  • HW was easy.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • and .
  • .
  • she talks about vegans too much.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews across several years give useful detail, but the evidence is old and somewhat mixed.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

LEAD2194 reviews
ENG2192 reviews
ENG1191 review
ENGL2171 review
ENGLISH21 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1