AI Rate Professor

Humanities

John Osborne

ENGLISH · 60SHUMANITIES · HUM60 · ENG4 · ENGL2 · CREATIVEWRT · HONORHON · THE60S · ENG6 · ENG · HUM8 · ENGLISH2 · HONOR1 · ENG21 · ENG2 · ENGL6 · HUM23 · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if and can tolerate inconsistency, but check the course section carefully.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPassionate LecturerLaid BackUneven ExperienceReading And Writing HeavyLenient Rewrites
  • Many students find him passionate, memorable, and discussion-driven.
  • Experiences vary sharply by course, with strong praise in humanities and serious complaints in some English sections.
  • Grades can be forgiving through easy tasks or rewrites, but some , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

Some students call the class extremely easy and mention rewrites, but others report lots of , and .

All authoritative format counts classify the evidence as in person, even when some comments mention online experiences.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

Many courses sound laid back and approachable, though English and honors , and tests.

All evidence is counted as in person under the supplied format flags.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

65/100

and preparation, but one review says he does not mind a few absences.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and personality, but severe negative reviews make him less universally safe.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Several reviews mention easy classes, rewrites, and forgiving paper policies, though some tests are described as hard.

Format shift

as in person.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload ranges from very and writing, so the blended load is moderate.

Format shift

All workload evidence is in-person-classified.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Students often praise his passion and class energy, but complaints about rudeness, lateness, and .

Format shift

All teaching evidence is counted as in person.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention papers, reading, quizzes, tests, and .

Format shift

All assessment evidence is counted as in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person-classified reviews are mostly positive about personality and engagement, but they include repeated , and some poor English-class experiences.

Main concern

The experience can vary a lot by course and by how much structure or .

What students said

“A very quirky and eccentric professor who really has a passion for the subject that he teaches.”
HONORHON
“Dont take him for english, Im not the only one that had a bad experience with him...many others in the class did not enjoy him and he was often creepy and flat out rude.”
ENG2
“Good teacher, a lot of reading and a lot of writting.”
ENGL2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and quizzes, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Hard TestsQuizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes, but do not clearly prove exam rules or proctoring.

Hard TestsQuizzes
“ though no matter how much u study.”
ENG21
“ !”
60SHUMANITIES

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A very quirky and eccentric professor who really has a passion for the subject that he teaches.”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and consistency. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“He opened up the world of literature to me.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

72/100

“ .”

⚖️

70/100

“You can re-write for a better grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • A very quirky and eccentric professor who really has a passion for the subject that he teaches.
  • so friendly and totally into what he teaches.
  • He is a great teacher. He's very laid back, and loves to teach.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easiest A possible at the college, as writing doesn't even need to be an effort, as long as there's posts.
  • Good teacher, a lot of reading and a lot of writting.
  • though no matter how much u study.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Consistency

  • Dont take him for english, Im not the only one that had a bad experience with him.
  • Almost always late, never professionally dressed, and seems to be on a drug high.
  • He worked with me prior, during, and after class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

32

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-two reviews over several years give rich and consistent evidence, despite course-to-course variation.

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 511
3 out of 53
2 out of 55
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG26 reviews
ENGL25 reviews
HUM603 reviews
HUM83 reviews
ENGL62 reviews
Show 12 more courses
ENGLISH22 reviews
60SHUMANITIES1 review
CREATIVEWRT1 review
ENG1 review
ENG211 review
ENG41 review
ENG61 review
ENGLISH1 review
HONOR11 review
HONORHON1 review
HUM231 review
THE60S1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values