AI Rate Professor

English

Leonard Adame

ENG6 · ENGLISH119 · ENGL101 · ENG102 · READINGCOMP · MCS · ENG12 · ENGLISH · MCS50 · ENGL119 · MCS13 · ENGL2 · CREATIVEWRITTI · ENGL4 · ENG119 · ENGLINA · MCS36 · ENG11 · ENG2 · ENGL6 · MC36 · 60 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

unless you specifically want a confrontational, discussion-heavy class and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing instructorHard gradingUnorganized classOpinion-heavy lecturesWeak writing instruction
  • Most students complain that he does not teach English or writing clearly.
  • Many reviews describe subjective grading, lost work, delayed grades, and poor organization.
  • A minority like his critical thinking focus, but the overall recommendation pattern is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A is possible for some students, but , and major effort.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The content is not always intellectually hard, but , and writing demands make the class difficult.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they show mixed difficulty with mostly negative execution.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

35/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though some students mention regretting or needing to attend class.

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students do not recommend him because , and ineffective at teaching English.

Recommendation and is strongly negative overall.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Many students describe hard, subjective, or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Workload varies, but students mention , and heavy writing expectations.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Most reviews say , and weak at teaching writing, despite a few positive comments about critical thinking.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and papers rather than clearly documented exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessment.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

concerns about bias, disorganization, weak writing instruction, and hard or subjective grading.

Main concern

Students often say the class feels opinion-driven and poorly organized rather than focused on English skills.

What students said

“Always unprepared.”
ENG119
“Very poor teacher. He does not make the slightest attempt to help you improve.”
ENGL6
“You wait forever for your grade!”
ENG119
“I worked my tail off & got an A.”
ENGL2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though one comment mentions tests on movies and another mentions a final.

Exam Policy Not Clearly ProvenMovie-Based Tests MentionedFinal Format Unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a final, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, midterm structure, or final requirements.

Movie-Based Tests MentionedFinal Format Unclear
“we watched many movies and was tested on the movies!”
ENG11
“he missed class ALL the time and even sent an aid for the final!”
ENG2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the least prepared teachers I've ever experienced. Either unwilling or unable to actually teach English.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“One of the least prepared teachers I've ever experienced. Either unwilling or unable to actually teach English.”

⚖️

18/100

“ but gives very vague subjects.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Pressure

35/100

“He wants you to JOURNAL 4 times a week, don't get behind!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Always unprepared.
  • Teaches absolutely nothing!
  • This class is all about "critical thinking" not anything about learning how to write.
  • Adame by far was one of the most interesting instructors that I have had.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • You wait forever for your grade!
  • He doesn't grade fair.
  • but gives very vague subjects.
  • Gives partial credit, and

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Workload

  • I worked my tail off & got an A.
  • He wants you to JOURNAL 4 times a week, don't get behind!!
  • It was an intense 8 weeks but it was fine.
  • Overall, the work load wasn't bad; 3-pg essays and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

60

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

, detailed, and mostly consistent negative pattern.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 55
3 out of 56
2 out of 514
1 out of 528

Course coverage

ENG29 reviews
ENGL27 reviews
MCS367 reviews
ENG1196 reviews
ENGL63 reviews
Show 16 more courses
ENGL1192 reviews
ENGLISH1192 reviews
CREATIVEWRITTI1 review
ENG1021 review
ENG111 review
ENG121 review
ENG61 review
ENGL1011 review
ENGL41 review
ENGLINA1 review
ENGLISH1 review
MC361 review
MCS1 review
MCS131 review
MCS501 review
READINGCOMP1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values