AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Stephen Reinbold

MATH217 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.4

The decision

Take Reinbold if you want a , and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear NotesHighly RecommendedOrganizedFair ProfessorEasy To Follow
  • Students consistently describe Reinbold as , and fair.
  • The course appears easy to manage if students attend and pay attention.
  • All usable evidence is in person, with no online review data.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

The class seems easy to do well in with attendance and attention, though not described as a free A.

All Easy A evidence comes from in-person MATH217 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Students describe the class as clear and easy to follow, which lowers the practical difficulty of the math content.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

as mandatory, but students say showing up helps you do okay.

Only in-person reviews exist, and as useful rather than clearly required.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

because , and organized.

Recommendation and is strongly positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

72/100

Students explicitly call him fair, but reviews .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

82/100

The course sounds manageable with attention and attendance, and .

Format shift

Workload and is indirect.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students repeatedly praise his clarity, organization, notes, helpfulness, and fairness.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in person and strongly positive.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe whether grades .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and assessment details are limited.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, organization, fairness, and easy-to-follow teaching.

Main concern

Students still need to show up and pay attention to do well.

What students said

“ and good notes.”
MATH217
“ and overall nice Professor.”
MATH217
“ and sticks to the syllabus”
MATH217

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring rules, or open-book policies.

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and good notes.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and course manageability. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“ and good notes.”

👍 Recommendation Level

94/100

“ !”

📋 Organization

92/100

“ and sticks to the syllabus”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and good notes.
  • and overall nice Professor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Success

  • pay attention, show up for class and you will do okay.
  • and sticks to the syllabus

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

65/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews are consistent and mostly positive, but they are old and .

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH2175 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values