AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jacob Brewer

MATH124 · MATH24 · MATHSUMTHIN · MATH214 · MATH108 · MATH101 · MATH63 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Use caution because the ratings look positive, but the comments are too thin and inconsistent to support a strong recommendation.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSparse CommentsMixed DifficultyUnclear Teaching EvidenceQuestionable DataMostly Positive Ratings
  • Most reviews give high ratings but provide little or no usable detail.
  • Difficulty ratings are sharply mixed, ranging from very easy to very hard.
  • One review questions whether the listed person was actually the instructor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Difficulty ratings are mixed and the comments do not give reliable evidence that an A is easy.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The math courses may be manageable for some students, but the comments are too vague and mixed to call them easy.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they provide weak course difficulty evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

, so flexibility cannot be clearly judged.

No online reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

The high ratings are undercut by vague comments and questionable data reliability.

All , but most comments are not detailed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe grading standards, curves, , or grade outcomes.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The comments .

Format shift

Workload evidence is absent from the in-person reviews and there are no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Some students praise him, but most reviews are vague and one questions whether he was the instructor.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person and has low reliability.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

No online evidence exists, and in-person comments do not describe assessment methods.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but vague, with several saying only No Comments and one challenging the listing itself.

Main concern

The evidence is weak because most comments .

What students said

“Mister Brewer rocked our classes world.”
MATH124
“I'm just dumb, he's the .”
MATHSUMTHIN
“this guy is not a teacher, he's a student”
MATH63

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or format.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I'm just dumb, he's the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting the limited usable evidence and inconsistent data. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Mister Brewer rocked our classes world.”

📉 Evidence Quality

28/100

“No Comments”

⚠️ Data Reliability

28/100

“this guy is not a teacher, he's a student”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Mister Brewer rocked our classes world.
  • he's the .

Theme 2

📊 About Data Quality

  • No Comments
  • First off this guy is not a teacher, he's a student
  • C'mon!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews exist, but many are No Comments, several are old, and one directly questions the listing.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH242 reviews
MATH1011 review
MATH1081 review
MATH1241 review
MATH2141 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH631 review
MATHSUMTHIN1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values