AI Rate Professor

Canada College · Communication

Eileen Pippins

COM100 · COMM130 · COMM100 · COMM150 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
8.33%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

unless you , and accept high grade uncertainty.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh gradingUnclear instructionsPoor communicationDisorganized courseDelayed feedback
  • Students repeatedly , and .
  • Grades feel unpredictable because , and expectations often appear after work is submitted.
  • Both online and class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because , and little chance to revise mistakes.

Both formats report harsh grading, with online students emphasizing late rubrics and in-person students emphasizing rigid deadlines and difficult exams.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course content itself is often basic communication material, but the disorganization and .

Online confusion centers on Canvas and assignments, while and unexpected test material.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Participation repeatedly matters, and students describe rigid deadlines and little flexibility.

In-person evidence points to participation and strict deadlines, while and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

6/100

Students overwhelmingly do not recommend her because , and support are consistently poor.

Both online and few older in-person exceptions.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Students repeatedly call her a expectations.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize harsh late grading, while and difficult exams.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload is not always huge, but , and rework make the effort feel heavy.

Format shift

Online students mention lots of homework and , while , and tests.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most students describe poor , and a disorganized class experience.

Format shift

Online teaching is criticized for poor Canvas structure and delayed replies, while and scattered pacing.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessments appear to include assignments, quizzes, exams, participation, and some group .

Format shift

Online reviews mention assignments, quizzes, and exams, while , and hard exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews also report poor , and intimidating classroom behavior.

Main concern

Students say lectures and course structure do not prepare them for .

What students said

“The students are left to teach themselves.”
COMM130
“ , & sets up students to fail.”
COMM130
“ ”
COMM150

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are overwhelmingly negative, citing confusing Canvas , and .

Main concern

Students say they cannot get clear instructions, timely grading, or useful communication online.

What students said

“the and difficult to understand so be ready to CONSTANTLY be asking her for clarification, to which, she will respond late.”
COMM100
“ and is very passive aggressive which is so unprofessional too.”
COMM150
“Quizzes and and have errors.”
COMM130

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe exams and quizzes as hard or confusing, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, or proctoring policy.

Hard ExamsConfusing QuizzesNo Clear Review

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and unexpected test material but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring policy.

Hard ExamsUnexpected Test Material
“ ”
COMM130
“the textbooks won't be talked about at all but will be in the .”
COMM130

Online

and exams but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Confusing QuizzesConfusing Exams
“Quizzes and and have errors.”
COMM130
“She is , and grades.”
COMM150

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“The students are left to teach themselves.”

⚖️

10/100

“ and does not make sense.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

6/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She isn't a good communicator, doesn't respond to students in a
  • read.
  • The entire course was so unorganized and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Even if you follow all of the instruction for .
  • She was so because she grades so late and very harshly with no opportunity to revise or resubmit.
  • You never really knew what your grade was.

Theme 3

🚩 About Student Experience

  • !
  • I wish I never took that class !
  • good luck to anybody who has the displeasure of taking this class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 24 reviews across many years and both formats show a very consistent negative pattern.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 520

Course coverage

COMM13013 reviews
COMM1507 reviews
COMM1003 reviews
COM1001 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 4

C range

3

C 3

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 5