AI Rate Professor

Canada College · Communication

John Perez

COMMC1000 · COMM150 · COMM180 · COMM130 · COMM110 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
27/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
30%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Take John Perez only if , and strict grading while actively asking for help.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderUnclear instructionsHeavy homeworkPolarizing humorParticipation matters
  • , and harsh grading.
  • A smaller group , and helpful when students ask for support.
  • The course can produce A grades, but usually with , and tolerance for inconsistent expectations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

39/100

A grades are possible, but students , and unclear expectations as the real cost.

Online evidence is harsher about workload and , while in-person evidence shows more A outcomes but still requires participation and effort.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

33/100

The content is treated like more than an intro course because assignments, speeches, APA details, and .

Online reviews call the course especially confusing and overloaded, while but still describe demanding public speaking work.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Attendance and participation appear important, with multiple in-person comments saying absences or class time affect passing.

, while online reviews emphasize deadlines and time spent rather than physical attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most students warn against the class because unclear instructions and and care.

, while in-person reviews are polarized between strong warnings and strong praise.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Students repeatedly call him a tough or and speeches.

Format shift

Both formats describe strict grading, with online and in-person students linking it to speeches and papers.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Reviews frequently mention lots of , and short deadlines.

Format shift

Online reviews stress stacked weekly work and Canvas confusion, while , and papers.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Positive comments praise humor and care, but the , and students feeling unsupported.

Format shift

Online teaching is rated weaker due to poor communication, while but remains highly polarizing.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

The course appears to , and some tests rather than relying on one method.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize assignments, readings, and quizzes, while , and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are sharply split, with and tone but several strong praises for , and public speaking growth.

Main concern

, and uncomfortable communication.

What students said

“He truly cares , and is funny as hell.”
COMM110
“ and marks you down for absences.”
COMM110
“He grades harshly and doesnt give you a .”
COMM130

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing unclear modules, heavy workload, strict grading, late or , and poor communication.

Main concern

Online students often feel unsupported and .

What students said

“This professor fails to make directions that .”
COMM130
“Awful. Gives an insane amount of work for just one class”
COMM110
“The instructions for everything .”
COMM110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, tests, speeches, and memorization, but they do not clearly prove a .

Quizzes MentionedTests MentionedSpeechesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final phone incident, but do not clearly prove a standard closed-book or proctored exam policy.

Tests MentionedSpeechesFinal Incident Mentioned
“ !!”
COMM130
“There were five short speeches rather than a few long ones”
COMM110
“failed 3 students during final b/c their phones went off”
COMM110

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes, reading, and memorized speeches, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Quizzes MentionedMemorized SpeechesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“Have to memorize speeches for a good grade”
COMM110
“ and questions don't always make sense”
COMM110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Ironically mediocre at communication. Changes directions multiple times, unclear with delivery, then gets annoyed when students ask questions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 30 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“He's a .”

⚖️

24/100

“Every assignment, he will literally find something, no matter .”

👍 Recommendation Risk

30/100

“save yourself time by not taking his class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very cool guy actually, and very funny at times.
  • He's a .
  • He doesn't really teach and grades them intensely.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • An A is very attainable in this class with effort.
  • Just do the work and ask questions.
  • Extremely nitpick, will find almost anything wrong with your work

Theme 3

🚩 About Student Experience

  • This class is a waste of time; and credit.
  • I cried, he said " Don't let my big personality afraid you".
  • got a bad review he is the !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

30

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty reviews across online and in-person formats over many years give consistent evidence of , and polarized teaching experiences.

Inside 30 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 515

Course coverage

COMM11018 reviews
COMM1305 reviews
COMM1804 reviews
COMMC10002 reviews
COMM1501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

13

A 10 · A- 3

B range

4

B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 4