AI Rate Professor

Canada College · Communication

Mariella Thaning

COMM150 · COMM110 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you want a supportive but demanding communication professor, but be cautious with the online format.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCaring in personSupportive classroomTough grader onlineAssignment-heavyMixed by format
  • In-person reviews describe her as caring, experienced, supportive, and growth-focused.
  • The online review is sharply negative, citing disorganization, heavy clustered assignments, boring lectures, and .
  • Grades can still be strong, but students may need to apply themselves and handle demanding communication work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Students earned A-range grades, but comments show effort is required and the online review calls her a .

In-person evidence suggests effort is rewarded, while and workload are tougher.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course is not conceptually extreme, but academic expectations, speeches, participation, and .

as growth-oriented, while the online review frames it as disorganized and heavy.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Participation matters and one tag says skipping class means you will not pass, so .

The , while in-person reviews also emphasize participation and community.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

She is recommended mainly for in-person students who want support and growth, but the online experience may be risky.

In-person reviews are highly positive, while the single online review .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

A-range grades are possible, but one student explicitly calls her a and another says she expects strong academic language.

Format shift

but fair, while as tough.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

The online , and in-person reviews suggest serious applied effort is expected.

Format shift

Online evidence shows heavier workload risk, while and growth than volume.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

and experience, but the online review reports a very poor experience.

Format shift

Teaching quality appears strong in person and weak online.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews mention speeches, participation, group projects, and .

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes assignments and group projects, while and academic work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, confidence-building, and academic growth.

Main concern

She expects students to apply themselves and use strong academic communication.

What students said

“She truly cares about her students and creates a .”
COMM110
“If you apply yourself, she has a lot of experience to offer and much to teach.”
COMM150

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review is strongly negative and , and tough grading.

Main concern

and assignment-heavy.

What students said

“ .”
COMM110
“ ”
COMM110
“Her lectures are long and boring and she is a .”
COMM110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, open-book policy, midterm format, or .

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She truly cares about her students and creates a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“She truly cares about her students and creates a .”

⚠️ Online Risk

32/100

“she is extremely unorganized assigns multiple assignments at one time that .”

👍 Recommendation Split

68/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She truly cares about her students and creates a .
  • Employs great use of academic language.
  • Her lectures are long and boring

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Expects the same from her students.
  • she is a .
  • If you apply yourself, she has a lot of experience to offer and much to teach.

Theme 3

🧭 About Format Differences

  • Her classes build confidence and community.
  • .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

and one is old, but the and the comments are detailed.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

COMM1102 reviews
COMM1501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values