AI Rate Professor

English

Gary Enns

ENGL272 · ENGLISH70 · ENG2100 · ENGLISH101 · ENG50760 · ENGL249 · ENGL101111102 · ENGLC10132016 · ENGL102 · ENGLC249 · ENGLI101 · ENG102 · ENG70 · ENGLC101201 · ENG101 · ENGL101 · ENGC102 · 36 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you want a demanding writing class and can tolerate strict formatting, heavy revision, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDemanding writing standardsTough MLA gradingHeavy workload onlineUseful feedback for somePolarizing teacher
  • Enns can teach writing well and .
  • Online reviews are highly polarized, with many recent students calling the workload overwhelming and .
  • Getting an A is possible, but usually , and sustained effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible, but students repeatedly say it requires strict formatting, careful revision, heavy writing, and strong attention to detail.

Online reviews make the A feel harder and riskier, while but still demanding path.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The course is intellectually demanding because essays, MLA rules, reading, and .

Online students report more navigation and workload difficulty, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews mention participation and online discussions, but they do not clearly prove a .

, while in-person evidence does not clearly establish attendance rules.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

, but many others strongly warn against the workload and grading style.

In-person recommendation is stronger, while online recommendation is highly polarized and weaker in recent reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Many students describe rigorous grading, harsh MLA penalties, and .

Format shift

as harsher and less predictable, while but more often seen as fair.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and overwhelming weekly work.

Format shift

Online workload is the heavier concern, while .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

and learning for some students, but others report poor organization, vague rubrics, and little help.

Format shift

Teaching is rated better in person than online, where organization and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment , and formatting rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats are assignment-heavy, especially online writing courses.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are generally , and demanding but worthwhile writing instruction.

Main concern

The main in-person and MLA requirements.

What students said

“He not an but you will learn .”
ENG101
“He gives great feedback, at least in English 2100.”
ENG2100

Remote format

Online

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are polarized but skew risky, with repeated complaints , and strict grading.

Main concern

The main and workload that can feel unreasonable or .

What students said

“Class is all over the place. Lot of work load, not an .”
ENG101
“This class was very challenging. He is extremely meticulous, grades rigorously.”
ENG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on papers, discussions, quizzes, and writing requirements, but they do .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policyQuizzes mentionedFinal mentioned in one review

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final in one comment, but they do not clearly prove closed-book, proctoring, or open-book policies.

Tests mentionedQuizzes mentionedFinal mentioned
“ and final are an easy 100%.”
ENGL101

Online

, and papers, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

Quizzes mentionedWeekly discussionsPapers
“You simply have 4 quizzes, weekly discussions, and 3 papers to write.”
ENGLISH70

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He not an but you will learn .”

Voice snapshots generated from 37 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

Teaching Quality

55/100

“He not an but you will learn .”

25/100

“He is extremely meticulous, grades rigorously.”

Workload Reality

22/100

“The weekly workload for a full semester class is more than DOUBLE the workload I had taking English over the summer 8 week course.”

Theme 1

Teaching Style

  • while critiques and engages his students.
  • Awesome! Caring! A real teacher..... You really do learn in this Class.
  • Doesnt give constructive criticism. Grades everything pretty harshly.

Theme 2

Difficulty and Grades

  • You must adhere to MLA or you'll be marked down, but .
  • The workload felt overwhelming, but I learned a lot.
  • He is very hard. Amount of work is astronomical compared to other professors I have had both in class and online.

Theme 3

Online Experience

  • Gary Enns class is incredibly as things are never where they should be.
  • Class is all over the place. Lot of work load, not an .
  • I took his English 102 class online and I have done so well.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

36

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-seven reviews across both formats and many years provide strong evidence, with and workload.

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ENG10111 reviews
ENG1026 reviews
ENGL1012 reviews
ENGL1022 reviews
ENGLC1012012 reviews
Show 14 more courses
302201 review
721091 review
ENG21001 review
ENG507601 review
ENG701 review
ENGC1021 review
ENGL1011111021 review
ENGL2491 review
ENGL2721 review
ENGLC101320161 review
ENGLC2491 review
ENGLI1011 review
ENGLISH1011 review
ENGLISH701 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 3 · A 4 · A- 2

B range

5

B+ 4 · B 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1