AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Elisabeth Fuller

C104 · CHDV104 · CHDVC281 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
11/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Avoid unless you can manage a heavy online workload with and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProOverwhelming workloadTough gradingLittle feedbackSlow responsesParticipation-heavy
  • Most reviews describe very , and .
  • Feedback and communication are repeatedly criticized as .
  • A few students earned A grades, but the effort and uncertainty are high.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

A grades are possible, but students describe heavy , and .

Online evidence dominates and shows hard-earned grades, while the .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Introductory material is described as unnecessarily complicated and workload-heavy.

Online reviews repeatedly say the course feels overwhelming, and the lone in-person review agrees.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Participation and .

Online reviews explicitly mention many required discussion responses, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students advise avoiding her because , and communication are major problems.

Both formats are negative, but the online pattern is much better supported by review volume.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly call her a and and high standards.

Format shift

Online reviews provide most grading evidence, while the as tough.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Students , and weekly obligations.

Format shift

Online workload complaints are frequent, and the .

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Most comments describe , and poor support.

Format shift

Online reviews repeatedly mention missing feedback and , while the .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

, and participation rather than exams.

Format shift

and discussions, while in-person evidence mentions papers and requirements.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only in-person review is strongly negative and , and .

Main concern

There is , but the one review is severe.

What students said

“ .”
CHDV104

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, with repeated complaints about excessive , and .

Main concern

Students may feel unsupported while completing a large amount of work.

What students said

“11 different discussion responses on 6 different days is a ridiculous amount.”
CHDVC281
“ and ”
CHDV104
“It takes her a long time to grade work, sometimes 8 weeks out.”
C104

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the exam policy.

Exam policy not clearly provenWeekly quizzes mentioned

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, open-book status, or final exam policy.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam .

Weekly QuizzesExam policy not clearly proven
“Just do the work, pass the weekly quizzes.”
CHDV104

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“ and late responses if any.”

📚 Workload Pressure

12/100

“4 assignments per week, and in order to get full credit, you have to respond to 5 people each discussion post.”

⚖️

18/100

“ and ”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • 11 different discussion responses on 6 different days is a ridiculous amount.
  • and
  • 4 assignments per week, and in order to get full credit, you have to respond to 5 people each discussion post.

Theme 2

💬

  • Through the whole course there .
  • and late responses if any.
  • provides .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Recommendation

  • if possible.
  • .
  • !!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews across several years are detailed and highly consistent, though .

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

CHDV1046 reviews
CHDVC2813 reviews
C1041 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

3

C 1 · C- 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1