AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Sarah King

ANTHC121 · ETHNC210 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take her only if you value learning and , and uneven student experience.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerMixed teaching qualityTough gradingGood feedbackHigh workloadSerious classroom concern
  • The evidence is mixed, with one recent positive review and two more critical reviews.
  • Students mention learning and feedback, but , and heavy work.
  • that meaningfully affects the recommendation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

The get and the workload was heavy, so an A looks effort-intensive.

Online evidence directly supports tough grading, while classroom experience.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Students describe meaningful learning and multiple perspectives, but one review calls the course tough and work-heavy.

, while in-person evidence is too mixed and sparse for a firm format split.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews , so the policy cannot be judged reliably.

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Recommendation depends on whether students prioritize learning and and the serious negative classroom concern.

The online review would not take her again, while and a serious complaint.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

The than full credit, and takes a while to grade.

Format shift

Strict-grading evidence comes from the online review, while .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The online review explicitly describes a tough course with a lot of work, though broader evidence is limited.

Format shift

Online evidence supports heavy workload, while .

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Teaching evidence is mixed, with one student praising her perspective and feedback while others report serious issues or only moderate quality.

Format shift

Online evidence is mixed but mentions learning and feedback, while serious negative incident.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The available evidence mentions papers, feedback, participation, and .

Format shift

Online evidence mentions papers and participation, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

compliment and a serious negative classroom experience.

Main concern

The main concern is inconsistent student experience and a serious respect-related complaint.

What students said

“She's a good professor, and she really shows you the all the different sides things well.”
ETHNC210
“Outed me to the entire class and backtracked claiming they should have updated it in Canvas.”
ANTHC121

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review says the course taught a lot but , and .

Main concern

The .

What students said

“This was a tough course.”
ANTHC121
“I learned a lot but it was a lot of work.”
ANTHC121
“she grades pretty tough.”
ANTHC121

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, take-home, quiz, midterm, final, or proctoring policies.

Exam Policy Not Clearly ProvenPapers MentionedParticipation Mentioned

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, quiz format, midterm, final, open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Online

The online review mentions papers and participation but does not clearly prove exam .

Papers MentionedParticipation Mentioned
“Also, she takes a while to grade, but .”
ANTHC121

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I learned a lot but it was a lot of work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student experience. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“She's a good professor, and she really shows you the all the different sides things well.”

⚖️

25/100

“I did not get full credit on anything, she grades pretty tough.”

⚠️ Student Experience Risk

42/100

“Outed me to the entire class and backtracked claiming they should have updated it in Canvas.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching and Learning

  • She's a good professor, and she really shows you the all the different sides things well.
  • I learned a lot but it was a lot of work.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • This was a tough course.
  • I did not get full credit on anything, she grades pretty tough.
  • Also, she takes a while to grade, but .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Experience

  • Outed me to the entire class and backtracked claiming they should have updated it in Canvas.
  • Pass her out of sheer spite. Or don't, I'm not your mom.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 reviews are available, opinions are inconsistent, and one format has just one review, so confidence is limited.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ANTHC1212 reviews
ETHNC2101 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2