AI Rate Professor

Criminal Justice

Jarrod Bowen

C32451 · ADMJ105 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take him if you want a , practical, and rewarding.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyReal-world examplesGreat feedbackResponsiveCaringEngaging lectures
  • Students consistently describe Bowen as , and engaging.
  • and manageable when students communicate.
  • Both online and , but evidence is limited to three reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

Grades and communication, but the evidence does not show an effortless A.

, while in-person evidence is positive but .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The course sounds approachable because he uses real-life examples and makes class engaging, though it is not described as extremely easy.

Online comments emphasize helpful resources, while and support.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Every review is highly positive, and students .

Both online and especially praising responsiveness.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

72/100

Students call grading fair and clear, but .

Format shift

Online evidence directly mentions fair grading, while .

Workload

Moderate

66/100

The workload sounds manageable because resources are helpful and not overbearing, but details are limited.

Format shift

Only the online review directly comments on workload and resources.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students , and ability to make class enjoyable.

Format shift

Online evidence highlights feedback and responsiveness, while and care.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly show whether the course relies more on exams or assignments.

Format shift

No format provides enough assessment-method detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

as fun, caring, and effective across multiple criminal justice courses.

Main concern

There is little detail about exams or workload in the in-person comments.

What students said

“His lectures are great and he will add in some jokes for fun to make them interesting.”
ADMJ105
“He cares about students and helps you out.”
C32451

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The online review , and responsive communication.

Main concern

The only online grade reported is a B, so an A is not guaranteed.

What students said

“Professor gives real life examples; and enough resources without overbearing.”
ADMJ105
“ and clear.”
ADMJ105

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , closed-book rules, quiz format, midterm format, or .

In-person exam policy unclear

Online

The online review does not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, .

Online exam policy unclear

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ as many classes with him if possible.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, support, and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“Professor gives real life examples; and enough resources without overbearing.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

96/100

“ as many classes with him if possible.”

⚖️

72/100

“ and clear.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are great and he will add in some jokes for fun to make them interesting.
  • Great teacher and makes class fun.

Theme 2

❤️ About Support

  • He cares about students and helps you out.
  • .

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • and clear.
  • He is very reasonable as long as there is communication.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are consistent and include one recent online review.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ADMJ1052 reviews
C324511 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values