AI Rate Professor

English

Yvonne Mills

ENGL102 · SPEECHC102 · C102 · SPEECHC101 · ENGC102 · C101 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

unless you can closely follow a detailed syllabus and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough gradingHeavy weekly workConfusing rubricsGroup projectsPoor learning value
  • and heavy weekly work.
  • Online reviews are especially negative about discussion , and .
  • A few students praise feedback, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

31/100

Some students earned A grades, but comments show the A requires strict syllabus compliance, heavy weekly work, and tolerance for .

Online evidence shows the heaviest grading complaints, while the but not enjoyable.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The course content is made harder , and nit-picky expectations.

Online reviews provide most of the difficulty evidence, while and weak learning value.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , but , and peer work matter heavily.

Online reviews emphasize required participation work, while in-person .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students do not recommend her because , and poor instruction.

Both formats are negative, but the online evidence is much broader and more detailed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

14/100

Students repeatedly describe her grading as , and based on rigid syllabus compliance.

Format shift

Online reviews provide repeated grading complaints, while the .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Reviews mention lots of homework, weekly discussions, peer reviews, group projects, and .

Format shift

The heavy workload pattern is strongest online, while .

Teaching experience

Awful

24/100

Most comments say she does not teach effectively and gives despite a few positive outliers.

Format shift

Online reviews include a few praise comments, but both formats are dominated by poor teaching experiences.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Grades appear driven mostly by discussions, peer reviews, group work, written assignments, and syllabus-based completion rules.

Format shift

Online reviews give detailed assignment-heavy evidence, while but .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are also negative overall, with , and group assignments.

Main concern

The main concern is poor teaching value despite some students earning high grades.

What students said

“This is the .”
ENGC102
“While I did receive an A in the class, I did not really enjoy it.”
C102

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students mostly , and frequent group or peer work.

Main concern

The main concern is unclear, strict grading paired with lots of weekly work.

What students said

“Don't take this class. .”
C102
“Very overwhelming with loads of weekly assignments around 5-6 that .”
C101
“her syllabus is about 40 pages long and .”
ENGC102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a consistent exam policy, and the course .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam formatAssignment-heavy gradingQuizzes mentioned in one review

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, or final requirements.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book exams, or a .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam formatAssignment-heavy gradingQuizzes mentioned
“Even if you get the be stuck at whatever grade matches all your criteria.”
SPEECHC102

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Don't take this class. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“Does not teach effectively.”

⚖️

14/100

“ and unnecessary.”

📚 Workload Pressure

24/100

“Very overwhelming with loads of weekly assignments around 5-6 that .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Does not teach effectively.
  • You won't learn from her or her class.
  • Dr. Mills is amazing. She went above in beyond in her lessons.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • .
  • and unnecessary.
  • She is really picky about grades and be prepared for discussions and peer reviews every week.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • There is also a lot of discussion posts and peer reviews.
  • Gave .
  • There is a lot of but its not difficult.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 14 reviews span several years and repeatedly describe the , and teaching problems.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 58

Course coverage

C1024 reviews
C1013 reviews
ENGC1022 reviews
SpeechC1012 reviews
SPEECHC1022 reviews
Show 1 more courses
ENGL1021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 4 · A- 1

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 3