AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Tabitha Weaver

POLSC101 · POLS101 · C101 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want a manageable political science course with fair grading, but expect , and some uneven instruction.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEasy gradingUseful feedbackDiscussion-heavyMixed lecture qualityManageable workload
  • Most online students say the class is manageable and graded leniently if you keep up with , and papers.
  • Teaching quality is mixed, with and lectures but some criticizing unclear audio, unclear instructions, or weak learning value.
  • In-person evidence is limited and more negative than the online pattern.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

An A is very realistic because multiple students say she grades easily if you complete the , and papers.

Online , while the limited in-person reviews call the class easy but less valuable.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The course is generally manageable, with , and short papers, though quizzes and unclear lectures add some challenge.

Online evidence shows a structured and manageable class, while and more critical of lecture quality.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

65/100

Reviews , but and participation-based work make consistent engagement important.

Online reviews emphasize weekly participation tasks, while .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and , though several warn about lecture quality, unclear instructions, or political bias.

Online recommendation is mostly positive, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

89/100

Students repeatedly say she , and rewards completed work.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews focus more on class quality than grading.

Workload

Light

78/100

The , and two papers, which most students call manageable.

Format shift

Online reviews consistently describe manageable work, while .

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Teaching is generally helpful because of feedback and materials, but , and bias complaints lower the score.

Format shift

Online teaching reviews are mixed but mostly positive, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment combines discussion posts, quizzes, papers, and one method alone.

Format shift

Online reviews give clear assessment details, and , quizzes, and papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

about political bias, weak structure, and low learning value despite an easy workload.

Main concern

The main concern is lecture bias and a class that feels flimsy or unproductive.

What students said

“her lectures are riddled with whiny rants about her personal political opinions”
POLSC101
“She has an easy class, but not in a good way.”
POLS101

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive, describing easy grading, , and manageable expectations.

Main concern

The main concern is inconsistent lecture clarity and .

What students said

“Very lenient on grading, all you have to do is do the work.”
POLSC101
“She grades very easy on the papers and discussions.”
POLSC101
“The lectures were awful”
POLSC101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but generally student-friendly, with and midterm or final essays or multiple-choice exams in others.

Open Book QuizzesOpen Book TestsMultiple Choice MidtermMultiple Choice FinalMidterm and Final Essays

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

74/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, or exam strictness.

QuizzesMidtermFinalTwo Papers
“The majority of your grade is a and two papers.”
POLS101
“Does not teach from a neutral .”
POLSC101

Online

Online reviews mention open-book quizzes and tests, multiple-choice midterm and , and midterm and , but do not prove webcam or proctoring rules.

Open Book QuizzesOpen Book TestsMultiple Choice MidtermMultiple Choice FinalMidterm and Final Essays
“ and .”
POLSC101
“The class syllabus included a weekly discussion and a .”
C101
“the bulk of the classwork is 14 discussion posts, 5 multiple choice quizzes, 2 papers a 500 and 1000 word paper, and a and final.”
POLSC101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very lenient on grading, all you have to do is do the work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

89/100

“She grades very easy on the papers and discussions.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“She provides amazing and and commentary, and is a !”

👍 Recommendation Rate

72/100

“ if I had to, very manageable class.”

Theme 1

⚖️ About Grades

  • Very lenient on grading, all you have to do is do the work.
  • She grades very easy and the bulk of the classwork is 14 discussion posts, 5 multiple choice quizzes, 2 papers a 500 and 1000 word paper, and a and final.
  • Professor is not a .

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She provides amazing and and commentary, and is a !
  • The lectures were awful
  • Her .ppt lectures are great, be sure to listen to the vocals on them.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • We typically only had weekly , and two short papers.
  • but they are short.
  • There's a and a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 15 reviews across many years give detailed and , and assessments.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 54
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

POLSC1018 reviews
POLS1015 reviews
C1012 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 4 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2