AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Tim Randolph

C146 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Take Tim Randolph if you want a and can handle a demanding computer science course.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDeeply caringInspirational teacherHigh effort requiredAccessible supportSerious workload
  • Students describe him as an exceptional, caring professor who actively supports them.
  • The course is not an easy A because students still need to do work early and on time.
  • All evidence is online, and there is .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

The professor is excellent, but the A is not effortless because students warn to finish work early and grades range from A to C.

All evidence comes from online reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

C146 appears conceptually demanding because students praise strong support while still signaling serious effort is needed.

; there is no in-person evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

, but participation and ongoing engagement appear important.

, and they do not clearly state an .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and deeply committed to teaching.

The recommendation evidence is entirely online and intensely positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Grades are not shown as harsh, but the A and C outcomes suggest effort matters.

Format shift

, and there is .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students imply a serious workload by warning others to complete work early and on time.

Format shift

Online comments show workload pressure; no in-person workload evidence exists.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students describe him as , and unusually impactful.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is online and exceptionally positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews mention lectures, classwork, and doing work on time, but .

Format shift

; no in-person evidence exists.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online students give extremely strong praise for his care, support, and teaching commitment.

Main concern

The course appears demanding, and late or weak effort can hurt outcomes.

What students said

“Truly an incredible professor.”
C146
“Do your work early & on time!”
C146
“Tim Randolph saved my life”
C146

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proved

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Truly an incredible professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“He has the most sincere wish to teach, and it shows in his lectures, classwork, and interactions with students.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

95/100

“Truly an incredible professor.”

📚 Workload Reality

35/100

“Do your work early & on time!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 Teaching Style

  • Truly an incredible professor.
  • He always takes questions, constantly checks on students
  • Overall, an incredible person.

Theme 2

📈 Difficulty And Effort

  • Do your work early & on time!
  • Tim Randolph saved my life

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Two recent online reviews are very positive but too few to and .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

C1462 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values