AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Marcus Duarte-Smith

SOCIC101 · SOC101 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
95/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

A strong online choice if you participate thoughtfully and use the opportunities.

Best fit · Effort For RewardSupportive FeedbackExtra CreditParticipation RequiredClear Study GuidesSociology Made Engaging
  • Students .
  • , and clear expectations make grades very reachable.
  • Participation matters, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Grades are very reachable because students report , and , though participation still requires effort.

All evidence comes from online reviews; there are no in-person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The course seems understandable and , but thoughtful participation and .

All evidence comes from online reviews; there are no in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

Participation is repeatedly required, especially in discussion work.

Online reviews clearly show required participation, with no in-person evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Students recommend him for , and engaging sociology lectures.

All recommendation evidence is online, and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

85/100

, study guides, and few grading items make the .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

65/100

The workload is manageable but and .

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from online reviews.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students describe him as , and able to make sociology engaging.

Format shift

All teaching evidence comes from online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment , and a few graded items.

Format shift

Online reviews mention discussions, exams, and limited graded items; there is no in-person evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are strongly positive, with , and clear expectations.

Main concern

Canvas organization and .

What students said

“ .”
SOC101
“ and many opportunities of .”
SOC101
“Participation is a must, just posting will not give you credit for the assignment”
SOCIC101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention exams and study guides, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or Lockdown Browser.

Study Guides For ExamsImportant Test DatesPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews mention study guides and test dates, but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Study Guides For ExamsImportant Test DatesPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“ and many opportunities of .”
SOC101
“leaving announcements to keep everyone updated of .”
SOC101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and participation. Credibility rating: Medium.

👍 Recommendation Rate

95/100

“ .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“ , and his excitement makes Sociology fun!”

📈 Grade Support

82/100

“ and many opportunities of .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Cool professor, tells you what you need to improve on.
  • Professor Duarte-Smith was very understanding
  • , and his excitement makes Sociology fun!

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Effort

  • many opportunities of .
  • Participation is a must, just posting will not give you credit for the assignment

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

60/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews are available, but they are detailed, recent enough, and , and .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

SOC1013 reviews
SOCIC1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values