AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Nakysha Cummings

PSYC101 · PSYC220 · PSYCC101 · C101 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
87/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
77.78%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take her if you want a and can tolerate reading, writing, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear grading criteriaCaring and responsiveEngaging lecturesReading and essaysSlow grading risk
  • Most students , and engaging psychology lectures.
  • Grades are usually strong, but , and .
  • Online reviews are more mixed because of writing demands and , while .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Most reported grades are A-range and students say clear notes or requirements make success manageable, but and .

Evidence comes from both formats, with online reviews stressing more writing effort and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The psychology content is generally understandable because she connects concepts clearly, though reading and APA writing add moderate challenge.

Online reviews mention heavier reading and essays, while and clearer lecture support.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Participation matters appears often, but the reviews do not clearly prove a .

Both formats emphasize participation, with .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

, and engaging classes despite slow grading complaints.

, while online feedback is still positive but more mixed because of workload and grading delays.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

A-range grades are common and expectations are usually clear, but writing mistakes and .

Format shift

Online reviews show stricter essay expectations, while lead to an A.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload includes reading, discussions, essays, and study materials, but most students still describe it as manageable.

Format shift

Online students mention reading, weekly discussions, essays, and .

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Students frequently , and engaging, with the main weakness being slow feedback in some sections.

Format shift

In-person reviews emphasize engaging lectures, while online reviews emphasize clarity and responsiveness with .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention essays, discussions, assignments, tests, midterms, and finals, so assessment .

Format shift

Online evidence mentions discussions, essays, midterms, finals, and mypsychlab exams, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are mostly positive about her lectures, real-life connections, and class engagement, with one .

Main concern

The posting.

What students said

“Clear instructions, grading criteria, extremely well-designed courses.”
PSYC220
“No one in the class knew how they were doing until the because she waited until the last week to grade anything.”
PSYC101
“Very experienced and knowledgeable professor.”
PSYC101

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students usually describe her as clear and supportive, but writing-heavy work and .

Main concern

Online students may face lots of reading, essays, and .

What students said

“Shes amazing and knows her stuff. However, she makes you work for your grade.”
PSYC101
“Professor Cummings and tests and doesn't ever create any test questions.”
PSYCC101
“ and caring and gave me extra .”
PSYC101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and essays, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or closed-book conditions.

Midterms and finalsEssay questionsMypsychlab exams mentionedPolicy unclear

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and course notes, but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Final mentionedExam policy unclear
“No one in the class knew how they were doing until the because she waited until the last week to grade anything.”
PSYC101

Online

, and mypsychlab exams, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Midterms and finalsEssay questionsMypsychlab exams mentionedProctoring unclear
“Midterms and finals over 70 questions with 2-3 essay questions.”
PSYC101
“I'm not sure why the class was because she didn't enter them into the gradebook.”
PSYC220

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Clear instructions, grading criteria, extremely well-designed courses.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“Very experienced and knowledgeable professor.”

👍 Recommendation Level

86/100

“ if you can!”

⚖️

76/100

“However, she makes you work for your grade.”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Makes content connect to real life and cares about your individual progress in the course .
  • Her lectures are hands on and interesting and she has and graded.
  • You will learn and you won't even realize you're picking it up that quick.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Work

  • As long as you read her notes online, you should get an 'A'.
  • Lots of reading and .
  • No one in the class knew how they were doing until the because she waited until the last week to grade anything.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

73/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 11 reviews span many years and include detailed comments, but experiences are mixed and .

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PSYC1016 reviews
PSYC2202 reviews
PSYCC1012 reviews
C1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 2 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values