AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Yihfen Chen

MATH141 · STATC134 · MATHC020 · CO32420 · MATH53 · MATHC152 · MATH55 · MATHC121 · MATH040 · MATH50 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Choose Chen if you want a more approachable.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring Math CoachBeginner FriendlyClear LecturesExtra HelpOccasional Pacing Issues
  • Most students describe Chen as caring, patient, and especially helpful for students who struggle with math.
  • The course is usually manageable, with , and strong support.
  • A few older in-person reviews report accent, pacing, or missed-class issues, mostly in higher math.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Grades look reachable because students , and an almost impossible-to-fail lower-level class if you care.

Online reviews mention and flexible test windows, while and effort-based success.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

73/100

Chen often and patience, though higher-level or rushed courses can still be challenging.

Online reviews describe helpful lectures and videos, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

65/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , but success often depends on engaging with her help and class structure.

, though online testing windows suggest some scheduling flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students recommend her because , and especially effective for math-anxious learners.

Both formats are strongly positive, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students , and that effort usually leads to passing or strong grades.

Format shift

Online reviews directly mention and clear criteria, while .

Workload

Moderate

68/100

Workload is not framed as heavy, but students still need to keep up with math practice and tests.

Format shift

Online reviews mention testing windows and videos, while .

Teaching experience

Excellent

89/100

Most students describe Chen as , and unusually helpful, despite a few older complaints.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is consistently strong, while negatives.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and proctored exams without showing one dominant assessment type.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews give broader class-support evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students usually praise her patience, empathy, humor, and ability to break math down, though a few criticize presentation or pacing.

Main concern

A small set of older reviews mention unclear presentation, accent, or rushed coverage.

What students said

“ and kind and is always willing to work with you until you understand what you are learning.”
MATH50
“she rush crammed 11 sections of Calculus in the 2 weeks right before finals”
MATHC152
“she doesn't know how to present material in a learning environment”
MATH141

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online students praise thorough lectures, helpful videos, quick support, and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“Did not need to read textbook due to how thorough Chen's lectures were.”
MATHC121
“Gives hours for and gives about 3 weeks .”
MATH53

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

One online review mentions a proctored exam with a long completion window, but reviews do .

Proctored Exam MentionedLong Test WindowPolicy Not Fully Proved

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and do not clearly prove exam policy.

Policy Not Clearly Proved

Online

Online evidence mentions a , but does not prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book status.

Proctored Exam MentionedLong Test Window
“gives about 3 weeks ”
MATH53

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and kind and is always willing to work with you until you understand what you are learning.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and concerns. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

89/100

“Chen is honestly the and she really cares about her students”

👍 Recommendation Level

88/100

“ .”

📈 Grade Effort

82/100

“if you care it is almost impossible to fail her classes”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Did not need to read textbook due to how thorough Chen's lectures were.
  • She really took the time and broke Math down to the basics

Theme 2

❤️ About Support

  • You can tell she wants everyone to do well.
  • She spent hours and days working with me outside of class.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • she rush crammed 11 sections of Calculus in the 2 weeks right before finals
  • she doesn't know how to present material in a learning environment

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews across many years provide detailed and mostly consistent evidence, though some older reviews conflict.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH553 reviews
MATHC1213 reviews
MATH1412 reviews
MATH532 reviews
CO324201 review
Show 5 more courses
MATH0401 review
MATH501 review
MATHC0201 review
MATHC1521 review
STATC1341 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 4 · A- 2

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values