AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Karen Moore

PHILC141 · PHILC164 · PHILC101 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
85/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you want a very attainable A and and messy instructions.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEasy graderHeavy readingExtra creditDisorganized instructionsLate work flexibility
  • if students complete the work and follow APA rules.
  • Workload is reading-heavy and assignment-heavy, especially online.
  • , and weak organization.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Getting an A is highly realistic if students complete the work, follow APA rules, and manage the reading load.

Both formats support an easy A, while online reviews show and assignments.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The course content is usually manageable, but , and .

Online reviews make the workload sound heavier, while easy.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

Reviews show participation matters, but there is little evidence of and late work is often accepted.

Online evidence emphasizes deadline flexibility, while .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

, but organization problems keep the recommendation from being universal.

Online recommendations are more mixed because poor organization is more visible there, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

92/100

Students repeatedly say full credit and A grades are common when work is submitted.

Format shift

Both formats strongly support generous grading, with online reviews also mentioning and late acceptance.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

The class is not hard, but many reviews describe lots of , and presentations.

Format shift

Online reviews show the heaviest workload, while in-person reviews range .

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Moore is described as sweet and responsive, but , and disorganization weaken the teaching experience.

Format shift

Online reviews report more organization problems, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessments , and a final rather than only exams.

Format shift

Online reviews provide the clearest assessment details, while and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

, but some still mention disorganization and unclear online components.

Main concern

Directions and .

What students said

“She's a - as long as you do the work, you will get an A in the class.”
PHILC101
“Basically an automatic A.”
PHILC101
“Class required lots of time & energy.”
PHILC164

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews describe an easy A with generous late work and , but and poor organization are common concerns.

Main concern

and heavy weekly reading make the online format tedious.

What students said

“Prepare to read, A LOT!”
PHILC101
“as long as you do the work it's an easy A.”
PHILC101
“The midterm was 10 essay questions that took nearly 20 hours to complete.”
PHILC141

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention midterms, a final, quizzes, and oral or essay-based assessments, but they .

MidtermFinalEssay QuestionsOral Final

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove broader exam rules or proctoring policies.

Oral Final
“then a as a class”
PHILC101

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes, midterms, a final, and essay questions, but do not clearly .

QuizzesMidtermFinalEssay Questions
“The midterm was 10 essay questions that took nearly 20 hours to complete.”
PHILC141
“There , and a 6-page paper throughout the semester.”
PHILC101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and an easy A. and receive full credit.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“Lots of spelling errors and the .”

📈 Easy A Potential

88/100

“If you do all of the .”

⚖️

92/100

“ and receive full credit.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • Prepare to read, A LOT!
  • and very time consuming.
  • Class required lots of time & energy.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • Basically an automatic A.
  • as long as you do the work it's an easy A.
  • Easy Class. Just do your work.

Theme 3

🧭 About Organization

  • Lots of spelling errors and the .
  • the .
  • a lot of the

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews across many years show consistent patterns in , and organization.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHILC1018 reviews
PHILC1415 reviews
PHILC1642 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 3 · A 9

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values