AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Vivian Baker

CHDVC100 · CHDVC149 · CHDV104 · CHLD0 · CHDVC205 · CHDV102 · CHDVC102 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take her if and structure, but if you need a light or clearly directed class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful feedbackHeavy workloadMixed clarityResponsiveStrict expectations
  • , and responsiveness.
  • The biggest recurring complaint is a heavy online workload with , and tests.
  • Getting a strong grade appears possible, but it requires consistent work and tolerance for .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible because feedback and grace periods help, but students repeatedly say the workload is heavy and the .

Online evidence is more negative about the effort cost, while in person evidence still says the class is work-heavy but more worthwhile.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The content is not described as conceptually extreme, but the class feels harder because , and tests pile up.

and excessive tasks, while in person reviews frame the same workload as manageable learning.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Participation and posting schedules matter, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

Online reviews mention required posting patterns, while in person reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

and learning, but several online reviewers strongly warn against taking her.

In , while online reviews are split between high praise and strong avoidance.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Some students call her fair and mention extra time, but and .

Format shift

Online reviews contain both fair-grader praise and tough-grader complaints, while in and .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Many reviews mention lots of , and time-consuming posts.

Format shift

Online workload complaints are stronger and more frequent, while in person reviews still describe quite a bit of work.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

and responsiveness are strong, but and miserable workload experiences hold the teaching score down.

Format shift

Online teaching experience is polarized, while in person reviews are more consistently positive.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and observations, so assessment is spread across both work and exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention more frequent quizzes, tests, and posts, while in and feedback.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person reviews are , and learning, though they still mention substantial work.

Main concern

Students should expect a lot of work even when the .

What students said

“She is not an "easy" teacher, as she gives quite a bit of work.”
CHLD0
“There is a lot of work but I learned so much in the course.”
CHDV102
“ and promptly posted grades.”
CHDV104

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are sharply mixed, with strong praise for responsiveness and fairness but repeated complaints about excessive work and .

Main concern

Heavy workload and .

What students said

“ and assignment plan, She also gives of plenty time to complete big assignments and papers.”
CHDVC205
“ .”
CHDV102
“She is NOT an easy teacher. She assigns a lot of work. A LOT.”
CHDVC102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention difficult tests and weekly quizzes, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or closed-book rules.

Tests mentionedQuizzes mentionedPolicy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews do not clearly prove the .

Online

Online reviews mention tests and weekly quizzes, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

Tests mentionedWeekly quizzesPolicy not clearly proven
“ as stated by the teacher.”
CHDV102
“There are and other assignments.”
CHDVC102

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is NOT an easy teacher. She assigns a lot of work. A LOT.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“ , and gets grades in quickly.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“Work load is excessive for a 3 unit class Posts cannot be made on less than three separate days for full credit.”

👍 Recommendation Split

55/100

“ and will be taking another class with her this next semester.”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very inspiring and kind.
  • , and gets grades in quickly.
  • Biggest problem is the clarity in directions throughout the entire course.

Theme 2

📈 About Workload And Grades

  • Yes, there's quite a bit of work, but this is also a college level class people.
  • She assigns a lot of work. A LOT.
  • and assignment plan

Theme 3

⚠️ About Recommendation Risk

  • .
  • .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews over many years give , and mixed student experience.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHDV1024 reviews
CHDVC1003 reviews
CHDV1041 review
CHDVC1021 review
CHDVC1491 review
Show 2 more courses
CHDVC2051 review
CHLD01 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Audit/No_Grade 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1