AI Rate Professor

Fine Arts

Katherine Hover-Smoot

HIST132 · ARTC106 · ART105 · ARTC105 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you want a feedback.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringResponsiveClear online structureGreat feedbackRelaxed workload
  • Every review gives her the highest quality rating and recommends her strongly.
  • , and availability, especially in online classes.
  • The workload is generally relaxed to moderate, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

High grades look very attainable with a relaxed workload and , though written work is not automatic.

Online evidence shows a relaxed workload but some harder writing grades, while in person evidence is strongly positive with limited grade detail.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Students describe the material as , and well laid out, making the course feel accessible.

, while in person reviews stress engagement and professor presence.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Reviews praise presence and availability, but they do .

Neither online nor in person reviews clearly establish an .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

100/100

Students uniformly recommend her because , and deeply engaged with student work.

Both online and in person reviews are fully positive, with in person reviews using especially strong recommendation language.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Grades are strong and , though written .

Format shift

Online reviews give the , while in person reviews mainly show strong outcomes and .

Workload

Light

78/100

The workload is described as pretty relaxed overall, with one in person review mentioning lots of homework.

Format shift

Online workload evidence is light and project-based, while in person evidence is positive but .

Teaching experience

Excellent

100/100

All reviews praise , and active presence in class.

Format shift

Online and in person reviews both support excellent teaching, with online comments especially praising responsiveness and structure.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews emphasize written work, discussions, comments on work, and a .

Format shift

Online evidence clearly mentions a and written material, while in and feedback.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person reviews are , and engaging class presence.

Main concern

One review mentions lots of homework, but the tone remains strongly positive.

What students said

“A .”
ART105
“I've never had a professor that comments on all of your work before.”
HIST132
“You always feel like she's in the class with you.”
ART105

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online reviews describe a and helpful feedback.

Main concern

Written material may be graded .

What students said

“Professor Hover-Smoot is very nice and gives a pretty relaxed workload.”
ARTC106
“Course is laid out super clear for an online class which is helpful.”
ARTC105
“She , but really praised when you made improvements.”
ARTC105

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The clearest assessment evidence is a and written work, while reviews do .

Project finalWritten workExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews do not clearly prove exam format, .

Online

Online reviews explicitly describe a , but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, quizzes, midterms, or standard exams.

Project finalWritten workPolicy not clearly proven
“The .”
ARTC106
“She , but really praised when you made improvements.”
ARTC105

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

100/100

“You always feel like she's in the class with you.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

100/100

“A .”

📝

100/100

“I've never had a professor that comments on all of your work before.”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • her classes are (a) and (c) really fun.
  • Course is laid out super clear for an online class which is helpful.
  • She really was there to help and .

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • Professor Hover-Smoot is very nice and gives a pretty relaxed workload.
  • She's really available to students and very nice.
  • the teacher was responsive and nice.

Theme 3

📈 About Workload And Grades

  • The .
  • She , but really praised when you made improvements.
  • Mostly, my online history teachers check in, but they aren't present.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are detailed, consistent, and uniformly positive.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ARTC1052 reviews
ART1051 review
ARTC1061 review
HIST1321 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values