AI Rate Professor

English

Joseph Martin

C040 · C101 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
60/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you want flexible pacing, but be ready for and reading.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear Criteria OnlineEssay GraderFlexible Online PaceHeavy Homework In PersonMixed Teaching
  • Online reviews are mostly positive, especially for open assignment access and .
  • .
  • The and changing syllabi.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Online students can do well with clear criteria and flexible pacing, but and the A.

Online evidence suggests fair effort for strong grades, while the and less predictable work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The course material is thought provoking and and organization than extreme concepts.

Online reviews describe manageable but thoughtful material, while the and surprise changes.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

Online assignments were open and self-paced, but the attendance rules.

Online evidence supports pacing flexibility, while in-person evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

65/100

Online students mostly recommend him for clear criteria and flexibility, but the and .

Online reviews are positive overall, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

, but one student says essays are graded hard and somewhat subjectively.

Format shift

Online grading looks fair but not easy, while the in-person review does not give .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Online work is flexible but reading and , while the .

Format shift

Online workload seems manageable, while .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

and responsiveness, but in-person feedback describes changing plans and low engagement.

Format shift

Online reviews are stronger than the single in-person review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews emphasize essays, assignments, homework, reading, and syllabus work, with .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The , and an uninterested mood.

Main concern

Course expectations may shift often and .

What students said

“ .”
C040
“He changes the syllabus every class.”
C040

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students describe flexible assignment access, clear criteria, decent responsiveness, and .

Main concern

expected.

What students said

“Professor Martin had open access to all assignments allowing for as fast as we wanted.”
C101
“ and it feels like he doesn't use a syllabus to grade”
C101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam .

No Clear Exam Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, open-book, midterm, or .

No Clear Exam Evidence

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam .

No Clear Exam Evidence

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Martin had open access to all assignments allowing for as fast as we wanted.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“ but if there is any confusion, Martin is typically fast at responding to inbox inquiries.”

⚖️

55/100

“ and it feels like he doesn't use a syllabus to grade”

📚 Workload

45/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The but I feel like there needed to be more and in a less general way.
  • Martin is typically fast at responding to inbox inquiries.
  • I think that he's very bored and uninterested in the class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and it feels like he doesn't use a syllabus to grade
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because and the formats give conflicting impressions.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

C1012 reviews
C0401 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values