AI Rate Professor

English

Laura Vasquez

ENGLISH70 · ENGL020 · B50 · ENG241 · ENGLISHB50 · ENGLC101 · ENG102 · C102 · ENGC101 · ENGLC070 · ENGL101 · ENG70 · ENGLC102 · ENGLC241 · ENGC040 · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
40.91%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you want a demanding writing class and are willing to ask for and often.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderLots of WritingHelpful If AskedMixed FeedbackAttendance Matters
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who value her feedback and .
  • The course usually requires , and participation.
  • Getting an A is possible, but students must follow criteria closely, manage time well, and often seek help before submitting work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A is possible but usually , and asking for feedback before deadlines.

Online reviews include both A outcomes and harsh grading complaints, while and draft feedback can improve grades.

Is the course easy?

Standard

43/100

The course content is not extreme, but the writing volume, reading, and .

Online reviews stress weekly discussions and essays, while , and following instructions.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

, and one says missing class can cost major benefits such as skipping the final.

In-person reviews strongly support attendance pressure, while online reviews and weekly tasks.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

and structure, but many warn against her because grading and workload feel harsh.

Both formats are polarized, with online reviews and in-person reviews more mixed about support.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Many students call her a , though some say grades are fair when criteria are followed closely.

Format shift

Online reviews include impossible standards complaints, while in-person reviews show better outcomes and attend.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students describe frequent , and tight deadlines.

Format shift

Online workload is heavy through discussions and essays, while , and attendance.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Teaching quality is highly mixed, with strong praise for feedback and support and harshness.

Format shift

Online reviews split between thoughtful feedback and poor structure, while and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Grades appear driven , and participation rather than exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention discussions, essays, and a , while , and attendance.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show a demanding but , and persistence.

Main concern

or inconsistent even after draft feedback.

What students said

“ if and dont miss class.”
ENGL101
“Then when it was handed back and I had received a C maximum.”
ENGL101

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are polarized, with some students praising feedback and structure while , and heavy essays.

Main concern

Online students are , and .

What students said

“ and I learned a lot from the class.”
ENGLC102
“I worked extremely hard for an A and she has impossible standards.”
ENGL101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus more on essays and writing assignments than traditional exams, and .

Final May Be SkippedFinal PaperEssaysNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention that perfect attendance and , but do not clearly prove the final format.

No Final With AttendancePapersDraft Review
“Go to every class and .”
ENGL101
“ if and dont miss class.”
ENGL101

Online

Online reviews mention essays and a final, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or .

EssaysFinal AssignmentWeekly Discussions
“There are a .”
ENG241
“Gives you one .”
ENGLC102

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The class was composed of 1-2 class discussions and a and an .”

Voice snapshots generated from 33 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“ and I learned a lot from the class.”

⚖️

30/100

“I worked extremely hard for an A and she has impossible standards.”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“If butt off every single week.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and papers.
  • .
  • Not really a teacher just an assigner .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • As long as you complete the and on time, you will get a good grade.
  • Grades tough but let .
  • I would be shocked if anyone gets an A in her class.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Plus she has an outrageous amount of essays.
  • Be prepared to do a lot of reading.
  • one week to write your 2,000 word english essays!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

33

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

The dataset has 33 reviews across online and but polarized experiences that consistently identify workload and grading as the main variables.

Inside 33 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 55
1 out of 512

Course coverage

ENGL1019 reviews
ENGLC1015 reviews
ENGLC1023 reviews
ENG702 reviews
ENGC0402 reviews
Show 10 more courses
ENGLC0702 reviews
ENGLISHB502 reviews
B501 review
C1021 review
ENG1021 review
ENG2411 review
ENGC1011 review
ENGL0201 review
ENGLC2411 review
ENGLISH701 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 3 · A 7 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

2

D 2

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values