AI Rate Professor

Languages

Denali St Amand

C101 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want an engaging instructor, but be cautious with the online format.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerFormat dependentStrong in personInflexible onlineParticipation mattersSlow email response
  • and strong Latin expertise.
  • because required conferences had limited times.
  • The experience depends heavily on course format.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

The +, but online graded conferences and limited scheduling make the A path effort-dependent.

In person looks rewarding, while online adds graded conference obligations and inflexibility.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course seems academically manageable in person but more frustrating online because of structure and responsiveness.

In person is described as fun and well taught, while online is described as rigid and inconvenient.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

The online review says required Zoom conferences are part of the grade and have limited times.

Online evidence shows low flexibility, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Students are split, with enthusiastic in-person praise and a strong online warning.

In , while online is explicitly discouraged.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

, but online graded conferences reduce flexibility and confidence.

Format shift

, while online grading depends partly on required conferences.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The workload is not described as heavy, but online conference scheduling creates extra burden.

Format shift

Online has scheduling burden, while .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Teaching quality and poor online responsiveness and flexibility.

Format shift

In person is praised as fun and skilled, while online is criticized for slow responses and rigid conferences.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The only clear graded element is online conferences, with .

Format shift

Online mentions graded conferences, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The as delightful, knowledgeable, fun, and a very good instructor.

Main concern

Participation may matter, but the review does not raise a major concern.

What students said

“I took onsite classes with her and found her delightful.”
C101
“she is a very good instructor who made the class fun.”
C101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review is negative because required Zoom conferences , and little flexibility.

Main concern

Required conferences make the online class feel inflexible.

What students said

“Requires conferZoom conferences that are part of grade.”
C101
“No flexibility which defies the purpose of an online class.”
C101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, open-book policy, or final structure.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Online

The online review mentions graded Zoom conferences but does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Graded Zoom ConferencesReviews do not clearly prove exam format
“Requires conferZoom conferences that are part of grade.”
C101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“No flexibility which defies the purpose of an online class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in format differences, teaching, and flexibility; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“she is a very good instructor who made the class fun.”

🔁 Format Difference

50/100

“This should be listed as a hybrid class because of the specific online conference times.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

50/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫

  • I took onsite classes with her and found her delightful.
  • Her command of Latin as amazing, and she is a very good instructor who made the class fun.

Theme 2

💻 About Online Format

  • Requires conferZoom conferences that are part of grade.
  • Times for these are very limited and have to booked with her in advance.
  • No flexibility which defies the purpose of an online class.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Participation matters
  • This should be listed as a hybrid class because of the specific online conference times.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

50/100

Evidence confidence

There are only two reviews, but they clearly separate opposite experiences by format.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

C1012 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values