AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Elaine Jackson

DMA111 · DMAC111 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself with little communication or feedback.

Best fit · Self Taught ProAbsentPoor CommunicationUnclear DirectionsDelayed GradingSelf-Teaching Required
  • Most reviews describe the professor as , and hard to reach.
  • Students and .
  • One positive review praises course materials, but it is outweighed by strong warnings.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A appears possible, but , and self-teaching make the grade costly.

The online review reports an A with poor support, while and falling behind.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The content is harder because students must navigate unclear directions and .

Online evidence stresses unclear grading and outdated tools, while and weak teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Neither online nor in-person reviews clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Students mostly do not recommend her because she is , and hard to contact.

The online review is strongly negative, and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

20/100

Students describe grading as unpredictable, delayed, and .

Format shift

Online evidence directly mentions unpredictable late grading, while .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Large projects, outside sources, and .

Format shift

Online evidence is about feedback delays, while and falling behind.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most reviews describe absent , and little help.

Format shift

Online and , though one in-person review praises written notes and resources.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews focus on projects, work submissions, tutorials, readings, and .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews mostly report poor , and a need to self-teach.

Main concern

Students can fall behind because directions and support are weak.

What students said

“She was entirely absent throughout the semester and does not communicate with her students.”
DMA111
“Lg. fall behind.”
DMAC111
“ ”
DMAC111

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review reports , and outdated tools.

Main concern

Students .

What students said

“Absent; ; grades 5 weeks after your work is done”
DMA111
“ , because you don´t really know what she wants.”
DMA111

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, or book policy.

Online

The online review .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“does not teach much.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

15/100

“ .”

⚖️

20/100

“ , because you don´t really know what she wants.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • does not teach much.
  • She was entirely absent throughout the semester and does not communicate with her students.
  • and concise lecture notes for each lesson.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • grades 5 weeks after your work is done
  • Lg. fall behind.
  • very hard to figure out what is expected in the projects.

Theme 3

📬 About Communication

  • .
  • Takes a while to .
  • Schedules web casts then postpones or cancels them.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because six reviews across several years are mostly consistent, though some are old and one is notably positive.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

DMA1113 reviews
DMAC1113 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values