AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Monette Fowler

C050 · MATHC055 · MATHC050 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you can handle strict expectations, heavy work, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderHeavy HomeworkStrict GuidelinesFrustrates EasilyFair If You Work
  • and .
  • Two reviews strongly criticize her teaching style and frustration with questions.
  • One positive review says she is fair and supportive if students work hard.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A or strong grade appears possible only with steady effort, strict guideline-following, and tolerance for .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

The math content is made harder by , and limited explanation beyond written notes.

Only in-person reviews describe the course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

One review says she expects students to be present and does not appreciate disengagement.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

because they describe poor help, frustration, and .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Tags repeatedly call her a , though one student says she is fair if you make the effort.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

Multiple reviews mention lots of homework and long note-heavy classes.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Students often describe unclear, frustrating teaching, balanced by one review praising fairness and feedback.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Reviews mention homework, physical assignments, and graded-by-few-things but .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

uneven teaching quality.

Main concern

Students report frustration when asking for help and a lot of homework.

What students said

“She gets frustrated when you ask for help.”
MATHC055
“Every class consisted of two consecutive hours of non stop note taking.”
C050
“Work hard and you will do good in her class.”
MATHC050

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly prove the .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, or open-book policy.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , but she is the worse math teacher I have ever had.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Minimal lecture outside of repeating what she had written on her clipboard”

⚖️

25/100

“Professor Fowler expects a lot out of you but she is fair.”

📚 Workload

20/100

“Every class consisted of two consecutive hours of non stop note taking.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She gets frustrated when you ask for help.
  • Minimal lecture outside of repeating what she had written on her clipboard
  • she is fair

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK
  • Work hard and you will do good in her class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Three consistent but , though the sample is small.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

C0501 review
MATHC0501 review
MATHC0551 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values