AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Rachel Winston

ALG101 · MATHCO55 · MATH20 · MATH040 · MATH111 · M055 · MATH121 · ELEMSTATPROB · MATH050 · MATH55 · C050 · MATH055 · MATHC055 · MATH251 · MATH141 · MATHMATH · MATHC040 · C055 · MATH152 · STATS121 · STAT · STATSTAT · MATHC121 · MATH070 · C142 · PREALEG · MATHC050 · MATH12155 · CALCULUS2 · 49 lifetime ratings

AI rating
73/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Take her if you want support and and can .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful and CaringHeavy HomeworkExtra CreditClear ExplanationsMixed by Course
  • Many students praise her support, clarity, , and second chances.
  • The largest complaint is a .
  • Experiences are mixed, with stronger praise in many in-person comments and sharper workload complaints in online reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

An A is realistic because of , makeups, and second chances, but students repeatedly say the .

Online reviews emphasize intense homework more sharply, while and recovery chances.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The math content is not easy, especially calculus and algebra, but many students say and structure make it manageable.

Online reviews describe more self-management and heavier pacing, while and handouts.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

as strictly mandatory, but several comments say coming to class helps and one mentions incentives to attend.

In-person evidence mentions attendance incentives and needing to attend, while online evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

, and generous with chances, despite heavy workload and some negative outliers.

, while online reviews are more polarized because of workload complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

, and second chances are repeatedly mentioned, though students still must complete the work.

Format shift

Both formats mention , but and grade recovery.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students repeatedly describe lots of , and many hours of work.

Format shift

Online reviews are especially strong about time burden, while students.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most comments describe her as , and responsive, though a minority call her unprepared or confusing.

Format shift

and help, while online reviews are more mixed and sometimes say students teach themselves.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention heavy homework, assignments, quizzes or exams, midterms, finals, and rather than one dominant assessment type.

Format shift

Online comments emphasize homework and computerized assignments, while , and classroom support.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

38 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive about help, clarity, , and chances to recover, though some report poor preparation or weak teaching in higher math.

Main concern

The workload remains heavy and the teaching quality is inconsistent across courses.

What students said

“Provides every opportunity to succeed.”
STATS121
“If you come to class and do the .”
MATH152
“50-70 question homework assignments for each section and an .”
MATH070

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews split between strong support and severe workload complaints, with repeated warnings about lots of homework.

Main concern

and feel overwhelming.

What students said

“Doing all of the in any of her classes.”
32333
“her class will take over 35+ hours a week.”
MATH055
“ but as devastating”
MATH152

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests, weekly exams, midterms, finals, and a , but do not clearly prove book rules, proctoring, or .

Tests MentionedWeekly Exams MentionedMidterms and Finals MentionedSecond Final Attempt MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and one second final attempt, but do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring rules.

Weekly Exams MentionedMidterms and Finals MentionedSecond Final Attempt Mentioned
“an . plus mid-terms and finals.”
MATH070
“ .”
MATH055

Online

Online reviews mention tests and many test problems, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policy.

Tests MentionedMany Test Problems MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“adds too .(35 problems at this level on a test?!)”
CALCULUS2
“ as devastating if you don't do too well on one of them”
MATH152

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Doing all of the in any of her classes.”

Voice snapshots generated from 49 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“She will go above and beyond for her students to ensure their success.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“her class will take over 35+ hours a week.”

⚖️

78/100

“We had countless opportunities to make up missed work and to get .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Conveys information very clearly.
  • and she provided handouts that gave examples and explained the material.
  • She is very supporting of her students and very helpful if you don't understand something.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Doing all of the in any of her classes.
  • as you are given a lot
  • If you commit the time to do the .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • Provides every opportunity to succeed.
  • She offers .
  • and very understanding of difficult situations.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

49

Recent reviews read by the AI

49

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

There are 49 reviews across many years and courses with consistent themes of heavy workload, , and strong support.

Inside 49 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 528
4 out of 56
3 out of 54
2 out of 57
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH0558 reviews
MATH1414 reviews
MATH1523 reviews
MATHC0503 reviews
722322 reviews
Show 26 more courses
C0552 reviews
MATHC0552 reviews
MATHMATH2 reviews
323331 review
ALG1011 review
C0501 review
C1421 review
CALCULUS21 review
ELEMSTATPROB1 review
M0551 review
MATH0401 review
MATH0501 review
MATH0701 review
MATH1111 review
MATH1211 review
MATH121551 review
MATH201 review
MATH2511 review
MATH551 review
MATHC0401 review
MATHC1211 review
MATHCO551 review
PREALEG1 review
STAT1 review
STATS1211 review
STATSTAT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 5

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values