AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Terri Stephenson

CHDVC105 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
21/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

unless you can handle required participation and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProNo feedbackSlow gradingRequired loginsAbsent online presenceHeavy meetings
  • The only student earned an A but strongly advises against taking the online course.
  • The course requires frequent logins and many required meetings, making it feel demanding for an online class.
  • The , and little discussion participation from the professor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

The student earned an A, but the required meetings, frequent logins, and .

Evidence comes only from one online review.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course is not described as intellectually extreme, but the structure feels demanding and participation-heavy.

Evidence comes only from one online review.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

The course requires many meetings and at least three logins per week.

Evidence comes only from one online review; there is no in-person evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

The student explicitly advises against taking an online course with this and participation.

Evidence comes only from one negative online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

The reported A suggests the grading is not impossible, but and .

Format shift

Only one online review discusses outcomes, and there is .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The course has many required meetings and at least three required logins each week.

Format shift

Only one online review provides workload evidence.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

The , and an online course that feels automated.

Format shift

Only one online review is available, and it is strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The , and feedback rather than exams.

Format shift

Only one online review provides assessment evidence, with no in-person evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review describes , and weak instructor presence.

Main concern

Students may feel unsupported despite being able to earn an A.

What students said

“You are expected to log in at least three times a week.”
CHDVC105
“ ”
CHDVC105
“It feels as if we have a computer for a teacher.”
CHDVC105

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It feels as if we have a computer for a teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in online teaching presence and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“It feels as if we have a computer for a teacher.”

📚 Workload

25/100

“You are expected to log in at least three times a week.”

👍 Recommendation Level

15/100

“I do not advise anyone taking an online course with this professor.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Presence

  • doesn't participate in discussion boards.
  • It feels as if we have a computer for a teacher.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Structure

  • The course itself was very progressive with a lot of required meeting.
  • You are expected to log in at least three times a week.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one review, though it gives specific details about online workload and feedback.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHDVC1051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values