William Lund

SOCIOLOGY101 · SOCIC101 · SOC101 · ADMINOFJUST · SOC100 · SOCI101 · SOCI · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 96/100
RMP rating: 4.2/5
Take again: —
Difficulty: 1.8

The decision

He is a strong choice if you want an interesting, low-difficulty sociology class with manageable writing.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy AInteresting DiscussionsLots of WritingClear InstructionsLaid Back

Students repeatedly call Lund's sociology courses easy and often describe them as an Easy A.
The workload is writing-heavy, but most students say the , and discussions are interesting.
One online review reports an , but the broader pattern is strongly positive.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

94/100

Multiple students explicitly call the class an Easy A, even though some writing is required.

Online evidence includes one unfair final-grade complaint, while .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

91/100

Students consistently describe the class as , and not difficult.

The online review is grade-focused, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

Reviews , but several online-style comments imply schedule flexibility.

Only the in-person-labeled reviews mention schedule flexibility; the single online .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

Students widely recommend him because the class is easy, interesting, and often fun.

The one online review is negative, but the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Students frequently report Easy A outcomes and one explicitly calls him an .

Format shift

, while the single online review reports a harsh final-grade outcome.

Workload

Light

78/100

The class is easy overall, but many students note a meaningful amount of reading and writing.

Format shift

In-person-labeled reviews describe light but writing-heavy work; the online review does not clarify workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students praise clear instructions, interesting material, respectful tone, and engaging discussions.

Format shift

The online review criticizes response and final handling, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Reviews mention essays, exams, readings, films, and and tests.

Format shift

In-person-labeled reviews provide most assessment evidence, while the online review only mentions a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person-labeled reviews are overwhelmingly positive, often describing an easy, interesting class with writing and fair expectations.

Main concern

There can be a lot of writing even when the class is easy.

What students said

“Very easy class, Mr Lund has great class discussions. Easy A”
SOCI101

“This class was extremely easy! I had a great time doing it.”
SOCI101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review is negative because the strong semester work.

Main concern

and instructor response may feel unfair.

What students said

“did excellent performance throughout the semester and my grades were good”
SOCIC101

“Professor lund opted to give me a D”
SOCIC101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are mentioned, but reviews do not clearly prove open-book status, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring rules.

2 Essays2 ExamsFinal ExamUnclear Proctoring

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and two exams, but do not clearly prove book policy, proctoring, or .

2 Essays2 Exams

“Only 2 essays and 2 exams.”
SOCIC101

Online

The online review mentions a and an unfair grade outcome, but does not prove proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book status.

Final Exam

“by the mere fact of a D”
SOCIC101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“Very easy class, Mr Lund has great class discussions. Easy A”
Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting ease, teaching quality, writing workload, and recommendation strength. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Great Professor. and chose interesting reading selections.”

📈 Easy A Signal

94/100

“Very easy class, Mr Lund has great class discussions. Easy A”

✍️ Workload Reality

78/100

“There was alot of reading and writing to be done, but it was a !”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

This class was extremely easy! I had a great time doing it.
He was a very easy teacher. There is some writing but it is interesting. This class is a easy A.
took his online class, it was easy, i got an A.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

Professor Lund was respectful, and understanding.
Great Professor. and chose interesting reading selections.
Mr Lund has great class discussions.

Theme 3

✍️ About Workload

A great professor. He makes you write alot, but nothing to bad.
Took this class online. It was alot of reading, but was an easy class.
Only 2 essays and 2 exams.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty reviews across many years show a consistent pattern, though some format labels conflict with comment text.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510

4 out of 57

3 out of 52

2 out of 51

1 out of 50

Course coverage

SOCI1019 reviews

SOC1014 reviews

SOCIC1013 reviews

ADMINOFJUST1 review

SOC1001 review

Show 2 more courses

SOCI1 review

SOCIOLOGY1011 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

No reported values

B range

No reported values

C range

No reported values

D range

D 1

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values