AI Rate Professor

English

Corey Marvin

ENGLISH70 · ENG101ENG105 · ENG40 · ENG70102 · ENGLISH1A · ENGLISHC70 · ENG102 · ENG70 · ENGLC070 · ENG101 · ENGLISH · ENGLC70 · EGLIS1A · ENGSECT · ENGL101 · ENG101102 · ENGC102 · ENGL070 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want a demanding writing course and are willing to use office hours for feedback.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderImproves WritingHigh EffortMixed HelpfulnessChallenging English
  • Students consistently say Marvin grades hard and expects serious writing effort.
  • Positive reviews credit him with making students better writers when they seek help.
  • , and poor interactions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

31/100

An A is possible, but comments repeatedly say grades require strong writing, revision, and extra help.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course content is writing-heavy and often challenging for an intro English sequence.

Only in-person evidence exists, and it consistently frames the course as demanding.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews are available, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Students recommend him when they value improvement, but and attitude.

Recommendation evidence is entirely in person, with sharply split opinions.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Most detailed reviews describe tough or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

The , and time-consuming writing tasks.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, with several comments calling the workload heavy.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

, and effective for motivated students, but multiple reviews describe poor support or attitude.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Reviews emphasize essays, papers, homework, and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessment, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a demanding English instructor who can improve writing but often feels strict and difficult.

Main concern

The and uneven student support.

What students said

“ if you see him in office hrs.”
ENG101ENG105
“Excellent teacher. Not an easy grade, but taking the class will make you a better student.”
ENG101
“Hard...too picky. Dislike the class verrrry much.”
ENG70

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Paper-Based AssessmentExam Policy Not Clear
“He had 4 eesays, which is what you are graded on.”
ENGLC70
“Requires you to ...enough said...”
ENG70

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Excellent teacher. Not an easy grade, but taking the class will make you a better student.”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“ if you see him in office hrs.”

⚖️

24/100

“A very good teacher, but he grades very hard!”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“class time consuming more than a 40 hour work week requires constant log in to find new surprise assignements”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • very helpful and concise
  • He is a very entertaining teacher.
  • The but not to students he doesn't like.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • A very good teacher, but he grades very hard!
  • . .
  • Even though he grades tough, he grades fair.
  • He did not grade very tough, and there .

Theme 3

✍️ About Writing Growth

  • I credit his teaching with my ability to write and get A's.
  • Excellent teacher. Not an easy grade, but taking the class will make you a better student.
  • Marvin is an incredible instructor, and I have learned so much from him.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 26 reviews span many years and show repeated themes, despite some old and vague entries.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 54
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENG1013 reviews
ENG1023 reviews
ENG703 reviews
ENGLC702 reviews
41 review
Show 14 more courses
EGLIS1A1 review
ENG1011021 review
ENG101ENG1051 review
ENG401 review
ENG701021 review
ENGC1021 review
ENGL0701 review
ENGL1011 review
ENGLC0701 review
ENGLISH1 review
ENGLISH1A1 review
ENGLISH701 review
ENGLISHC701 review
ENGSECT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values