AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Patricia Frasier

ARCGB · ANTH101 · ANTHRC121 · ANTHR121 · ANTH · ANTHRC101 · ANTH111 · ANTH141 · ANTHC111 · ANTHR102 · ANTHC121 · PHYSICALANTH · ANTH121 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take her if you can follow instructions closely and ; avoid her if you need a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPrepared LecturesRude FeedbackOpen-Book TestsCollege-Level ExpectationsMixed Reputation
  • Students strongly disagree about her, with some praising preparation and .
  • Many reviews say the course can be easy if students follow instructions and use lecture notes.
  • Tests and because she expects detailed college-level work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Several students report easy A outcomes with open-book tests and lecture notes, but the grade depends on following instructions and .

Online reviews sound easy, while college-level work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The material is manageable with lectures and notes, but some students found the information load and tests hard.

Online evidence is clearer and easier, while and sometimes challenging.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Reviews focus on online-style discussions and coursework, and do not clearly prove a .

Neither online nor .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Recommendations depend heavily on whether the student values structured lectures or is frustrated .

Online reviews are mildly positive, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Some students call her an , but , and high expectations.

Format shift

Online reviews lean lenient, while .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

, and tests, but many students say it is manageable if you follow directions.

Format shift

Online reviews suggest lighter work, while and preparation.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Her prepared lectures are a strength, but repeated complaints about rude or .

Format shift

Online reviews are more positive, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

The course uses tests along with essays, discussions, readings, and lecture notes.

Format shift

Both formats mention tests and written or discussion-based work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person-coded reviews are highly mixed, with repeated praise for preparation and .

Main concern

Her comments and .

What students said

“Not a free ride, so be serious if .”
ANTHC111
“This was a horrible class. The teacher is VERY rude in her postings and .”
ANTH121
“ LECTURES" and you'll be fine !!!!!”
ANTHR102

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews , and slower communication.

Main concern

She may be slow to answer questions.

What students said

“she's an .”
PHYSICALANTH
“ .”
ANTHC121
“she's horrible about getting back to you on time.”
PHYSICALANTH

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Multiple reviews explicitly describe open-book or relatively student-friendly despite some difficulty complaints.

Open BookOpen NotesLecture-Based TestsOnline Tests

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and lecture-based tests.

Open BookOpen NotesLecture-Based TestsOnline Tests
“All open book/note.”
ANTHC121
“ LECTURES" and you'll be fine !!!!!”
ANTHR102
“ and their not hard”
ANTH121

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam policy beyond one general comment that getting an A was not difficult.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want to learn, Professor Frasier is a great instructor to learn from. Not a free ride, so be serious if .”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“She invests a great deal of time and Preparation in her lectures, which always contain the .”

⚖️

60/100

“she's an .”

⚠️ Student Experience

38/100

“This was a horrible class. The teacher is VERY rude in her postings and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She invests a great deal of time and Preparation in her lectures, which always contain the .
  • There was a ton of information, and the instruction did little to help teach it.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It was not difficult to get an A.
  • Easy A for very minimal work.
  • short period.
  • Not a free ride, so be serious if .

Theme 3

💬

  • if you do not meet her exact expectations during the online lectures and discussion boards.
  • I found her very easy to communicate with. She was never rude.
  • she's horrible about getting back to you on time.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-six reviews across many years give strong volume and consistent themes, despite mixed opinions and older dates.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 56
3 out of 54
2 out of 54
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ANTH1217 reviews
ANTHC1216 reviews
ANTH1112 reviews
ANTHC1112 reviews
ANTH1 review
Show 8 more courses
ANTH1011 review
ANTH1411 review
ANTHR1021 review
ANTHR1211 review
ANTHRC1011 review
ANTHRC1211 review
ARCGB1 review
PHYSICALANTH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values