AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Kathy Bultman

CSCICSCI · CSCIC123 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you and rely on the book or tutoring when needed.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing AssignmentsInconsistent HelpNice But UnevenBook-Based Learning
  • Students disagree sharply on and helpful.
  • The and unclear expectations.
  • She is described as nice and well-intentioned, but teaching quality appears unreliable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

The course may not be intellectually hard, but and .

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Content can be manageable and book-based, but the material itself.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

In-person , and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

She may work for independent students, but multiple , and .

All and is mixed but tilted negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

, especially when points are lost for correct answers done the wrong way.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload does not sound overwhelming, but .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Teaching is inconsistent, with one student praising clarity but others saying she is unhelpful and confusing.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews focus mainly on assignments, instructions, and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

clear positive review and two serious complaints about help and assignment clarity.

Main concern

Assignments and .

What students said

“ .”
CSCICSCI
“ and gives help anytime you need it.”
CSCIC123
“ ”
CSCIC123

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proved

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, quiz format, midterm format, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proved

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ; it was more difficult to figure out what she wanted you to do than to do it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“ , but has no idea how to teach.”

📚 Assignment Clarity

32/100

“ ; it was more difficult to figure out what she wanted you to do than to do it.”

⚖️

32/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • and gives help anytime you need it.
  • , but has no idea how to teach.

Theme 2

📋

  • if you know how to do it.
  • " way.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

36/100

Evidence confidence

, and student experiences are inconsistent.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CSCIC1232 reviews
CSCICSCI1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values