AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Talia Fraser

HS073 · HS013 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
51/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Take Fraser if you can manage a lot of reading and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardManageable but unevenHard to contactLots of homeworkFair gradingUnorganized online
  • Grades can be good when students complete the work, but workload is often heavy in short sessions.
  • Students split sharply between supportive, engaging experiences and frustration with poor communication.
  • Online organization and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many students earned A grades, but comments show the A , and self-management.

Online evidence is mixed because some call assignments easy while others describe heavy work; the and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The material can be manageable, but short-session pacing, reading, and .

Online intersession reviews are notably harder, while the and homework.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

Reviews mention participation and Zoom confusion but .

Online reviews mention participation and , while the in-person review only mentions participation matters through tags.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation is split because supportive teaching and and organization problems.

Online reviews are sharply mixed, while the but too limited to outweigh the online pattern.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

and sometimes easy for completed work, but the course is not effortless due to workload.

Format shift

Online comments support fair grading, and the .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Workload is often heavy, especially in winter or intersession classes with daily assignments and papers.

Format shift

Online reviews repeatedly mention lots of work, while the and homework.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Students describe Fraser as supportive and engaging at times, but unorganized and hard to contact in several reviews.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is mixed, while the style.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment includes assignments, reading, papers, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention assignments, quizzes, papers, and a final; the and homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single in-person review says the class is easy if students keep up with reading and .

Main concern

Evidence .

What students said

“Its a easy class if you do the reading and the homework.”
HS013

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with some students praising support and while others report heavy workload, weak organization, and poor responses.

Main concern

The main online concern is unreliable communication and .

What students said

“Could not contact. .”
HS013
“Lots of (if you did it you get full credit), and .”
HS073

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

reporting a surprise final and another warning that quizzes go fast, but proctoring is not clearly proven.

Final Exam MentionedFast QuizzesResearch PaperReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Online

Online reviews mention a final exam posted shortly before due and fast quizzes, but do not clearly .

Final Exam MentionedFast QuizzesResearch PaperNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“Did NOT let class know there was a .”
HS013
“ so study the material before!”
HS013

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Lots of (if you did it you get full credit), and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, communication, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“ and class felt all over the place.”

📈

68/100

“Lots of (if you did it you get full credit), and .”

⚠️ Communication Risk

50/100

“Professor was not easy to contact.I sent her many emails and for the most part, never got a response back.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This was a great course with a very kind and supportive professor.
  • and responded promptly to questions/concerns at first.
  • Felt like no one was teaching me.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • . lots of work for 3 weeks.
  • Gives a lot of work.
  • 2to3 assignments on the daily basis/ including weekends/ syllabus not accurate

Theme 3

📩 About Communication

  • Could not contact. .
  • Takes 3
  • As far as not being able to contact her many times, from emailing her on canvas to emailing her through .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews span several years and give detailed, consistent concerns about workload and contact, though only one is in person.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HS0135 reviews
HS0733 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 5 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values