AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Angela Lewis

INFORMATICS1 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid unless you can teach yourself the material and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf Teaching RequiredUnorganizedTough GraderGroup ProjectsPoor Communication
  • Students consistently say the class requires self-teaching because .
  • Reviews describe her as , and slow or absent in communication.
  • as and unexpectedly weighted quizzes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Some students earned decent grades, but and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The material is harder to handle because lectures .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Reviews mention participation and class experience but do not clearly prove a .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students strongly advise choosing another professor because teaching, organization, and communication are poor.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students describe tough grading on group projects and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

The official workload is unclear, but self-teaching, textbook reliance, group projects, and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Every review rates the teaching poorly, citing disorganization, off-topic class time, fast pacing, and lack of lectures.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Reviews mention group projects and quizzes more than formal exams, with .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All reviews are in person and describe poor organization, self-teaching, fast or off-topic lectures, and .

Main concern

Students may be left to learn the .

What students said

“you basically have to teach yourself about informatics.”
INFORMATICS1
“ ”
INFORMATICS1
“ .”
INFORMATICS1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention Kahoot quizzes counted as test grades, but do .

Kahoot QuizzesExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as , but do not clearly prove midterm, final, open-book, or proctoring policy.

Kahoot QuizzesExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“ .”
INFORMATICS1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , if you need this class get a different professor, be ready to teach yourself with the textbook, there is .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“ , if you need this class get a different professor, be ready to teach yourself with the textbook, there is .”

📚 Self Teaching Load

28/100

“you basically have to teach yourself about informatics.”

⚖️

18/100

“Graded extremely hard on group projects and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She honestly was a great person, just a really bad teacher.
  • She spent most of class talking in a monotone to herself while everyone was either completely lost or not paying attention altogether.
  • there is .

Theme 2

📚 About Learning Burden

  • you basically have to teach yourself about informatics.
  • be ready to teach yourself with the textbook
  • she will get off topic and .

Theme 3

⚖️

  • Graded
  • .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews are limited but consistent across multiple years and all describe severe teaching and organization problems.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

INFORMATICS14 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1