AI Rate Professor

Health Science

M. Kelsey

HS13 · HS013 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid this class unless , and are willing to follow rubrics exactly.

Best fit · Effort For RewardOverwhelming WorkloadTough GraderUnclear ExpectationsGroup AssignmentsNot Working-Adult Friendly
  • Most online reviews warn about unclear expectations, , and stressful group work.
  • The but still says the workload is very heavy.
  • Passing is possible, but earning an A and strong organization.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A is possible, but students , and heavy busywork make it costly.

Online reviews and clarity, while the single in-person review says organized students can succeed despite heavy work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The content does not sound conceptually impossible, but , and group tasks make the class feel harder.

Online reviews emphasize unclear expectations, while the as heavy busywork.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

Online reviews say live meetings or videos are required and .

Online reviews support mandatory live participation, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Most students warn against taking her because of , and poor communication.

Online reviews are strongly negative, while the only in-person review is conditionally positive for organized students.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Students repeatedly call her a and .

Format shift

Online reviews strongly report harsh grading, while the .

Workload

Overwhelming

5/100

Multiple students describe seven or , and unrealistic deadlines.

Format shift

Online workload complaints are severe, and the in-person winter review also says the class feels heavier than its credits.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Most reviews describe unclear expectations, poor organization, weak communication, and stressful course design despite occasional comments that .

Format shift

, while the in-person review is more favorable but still workload-heavy.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Grades appear driven by , and other coursework rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and participation, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The but still says the class has a lot of busywork and feels heavier than its credits.

Main concern

The workload is intense, especially for students with jobs.

What students said

“soo much work but its just busy work.”
HS13
“Basically this class felt like a 4 credit class but its only 3.”
HS13

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students mostly report excessive assignments, unclear expectations, strict rubric grading, required live videos, and poor communication.

Main concern

The online workload and and stressful.

What students said

“This professors work load is so ridiculous!”
HS013
“She is not very clear in what she expects in her work.”
HS013
“ .”
HS013

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the , or finals.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The in-person review discusses workload and busywork but does .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Online reviews mention assignments, discussions, live videos, and meetings, but do .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professors work load is so ridiculous!”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Pressure

5/100

“She has 7 or and wants you to respond with two paragraphs to 4 peers in discussion posts.”

⚖️

20/100

“If you don't follow her rubric to a tee she'll absolutely mark you down in points.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“She is not very clear in what she expects in her work.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • This professors work load is so ridiculous!
  • She has 7 or and wants you to respond with two paragraphs to 4 peers in discussion posts.
  • Her class is not design for working adults.
  • soo much work but its just busy work.

Theme 2

⚖️ About Difficulty & Grades

  • Just too picky on grading and never really .
  • If you don't follow her rubric to a tee she'll absolutely mark you down in points.
  • .

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is not very clear in what she expects in her work.
  • I felt she .
  • No communicating if u ask about grade.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because seven reviews across several years show a consistent pattern of , and .

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 56

Course coverage

HS0135 reviews
HS132 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1