AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Leatrice Clark

HS013 · NUTRITION · HE001 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.8

The decision

Avoid this professor unless and tolerate disorganized course management.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing instructionsPoor online organizationTough gradingMandatory random ZoomAvoided by students
  • Students overwhelmingly describe the class as confusing because instructions, modules, and .
  • The material itself is not the main problem; the and course structure.
  • Recommendation is extremely low, with students directly .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A is hard to secure because unclear instructions and is not difficult.

Online reviews emphasize vague assignments and tough grading, while the and unclear instructions.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The subject matter is described as not very difficult, but the course becomes hard because the .

Online evidence directly says the material is not difficult, while in-person evidence focuses more on cluttered modules and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

The in-person-labeled review says Zoom attendance was randomly required for as mandatory.

Attendance problems are supported by the single in-person-labeled review; online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

because poor organization and vague instructions dominate the course experience.

Online reviews are consistently negative, and the tries to help.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

Students report tough grading combined with and hard to navigate.

Format shift

Online reviews provide the clearest tough-grading evidence; .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The workload feels heavy mainly because students must spend extra .

Format shift

Online students repeatedly describe scavenger-hunt confusion, while the in-person-labeled review reports cluttered modules and .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Teaching quality is very low because students describe poor organization, vague directions, and more confusion after seeking help.

Format shift

Online reviews are overwhelmingly negative, and the she tries to help.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews focus on assignments, modules, discussion boards, and .

Format shift

Both formats discuss assignment clarity and course structure, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single in-person-labeled review , and unclear assignments despite some willingness to help.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Zoom wasnt supposed to be mandatory but she makes it a point to make us get on at random times on random .”
HS013
“Her modules are cluttered and confusing.”
HS013

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, focusing on vague directions, cluttered organization, and avoidable confusion.

Main concern

Students struggle to understand assignments and course expectations.

What students said

“this class was horrendously put together.”
HE001
“It feels like everything is all over and I am on a scavenger hunt to figure out what I am supposed to be doing for assignments.”
NUTRITION
“Gave very vague instructions to the effect that I had no idea what I was doing on the assignments.”
HS013

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam formatAssignments emphasizedAttendance points mentioned

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The but does not clearly prove exam policy.

Attendance points mentionedReviews do not clearly prove in-person exam policy
“ .”
HS013

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, .

Reviews do not clearly prove online exam policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do whatever .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting repeated , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation Risk

8/100

“Do whatever .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“ but .”

🧩 Organization Problems

30/100

“It feels like everything is all over and I am on a scavenger hunt to figure out what I am supposed to be doing for assignments.”

Theme 1

🧩 About Organization

  • this class was horrendously put together.
  • Her modules are cluttered and confusing.

Theme 2

📝 About Instructions and Grading

  • Gave very vague instructions to the effect that I had no idea what I was doing on the assignments.
  • .
  • And on top of that she grades tough

Theme 3

📵 and Support

  • Zoom wasnt supposed to be mandatory but she makes it a point to make us get on at random times on random .
  • Willing to zoom/text and help any time.
  • but .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

, but their complaints are detailed and highly consistent across multiple online courses.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

HS0133 reviews
HE0011 review
NUTRITION1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values