AI Rate Professor

Cuyamaca College · Chemistry

Sabrina Dilts

CHEM142 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Take her if you can handle fast lectures and want opportunities, but .

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra creditFast lecturesParticipation mattersPosted slidesInconsistent clarity
  • Grades can be strong because helps offset uncurved tests.
  • Teaching quality is mixed, with one student calling it fine and another struggling to learn from fast lectures.
  • , and may be tied to attendance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Both reported grades are A-range and helps, but fast lectures and .

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Students describe fast lectures and difficulty learning or retaining chemistry material.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation matters and , but reviews do not prove strict mandatory attendance.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

and access, but teaching clarity is inconsistent.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

, but copious and A-range reported grades make outcomes relatively forgiving.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The workload is not described as overwhelming, but , and chemistry pacing require steady effort.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

She offers slides and office hours, but fast note-based lectures made learning difficult for at least one student.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and office hours are mentioned, with no single assessment type fully dominating.

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show mixed teaching , and useful .

Main concern

Fast lectures can make the material hard to learn and retain.

What students said

“ .”
CHEM-142
“difficulty was mediated with copious opportunities”
CHEM-142
“She reads her notes very fast when lecturing”
CHEM-142

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention uncurved tests and , but do not clearly prove book policy, proctoring, or .

Tests not curvedExtra credit opportunitiesExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but do not clearly prove the full exam policy.

Tests not curvedExtra credit opportunities
“ ”
CHEM-142
“difficulty was mediated with copious opportunities”
CHEM-142

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She reads her notes very fast when lecturing, which made it difficult to engage and retain information.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“She reads her notes very fast when lecturing, which made it difficult to engage and retain information.”

⚖️

72/100

“difficulty was mediated with copious opportunities”

📚 Course Difficulty

35/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She reads her notes very fast when lecturing
  • I had a hard time learning the material from her.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades &

  • difficulty was mediated with copious opportunities
  • Only letter grades are posted.

Theme 3

🧭 About Support

  • consistent office hours every week

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Two recent reviews give consistent concerns about pacing and , but the sample size remains small.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CHEM-1422 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values