Angela Chung

MATH125 · MATH245 · MATH261 · 20094E49 · MATH260 · MATH227S · 54 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 75/100
RMP rating: 4.0/5
Take again: 72.22%
Difficulty: 3.3

The decision

if you want strong math instruction and are ready to put in serious weekly work for the grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear Math ExplanationsHeavy HomeworkExtra Credit And Study GuidesFast PaceEffort-Based Grades

Many students call Chung an excellent math teacher who breaks down hard concepts and provides useful study guides.
The A path is real but , and consistent studying.
Negative reviews focus on fast pacing, skipped steps, strict work expectations, and especially intense online workload.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

67/100

An A is attainable with , and , but students repeatedly say the grade requires real work.

as worthwhile, while online reviews include stronger warnings about workload and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

The math content is inherently challenging and often fast-paced, even though and packets help many students understand it.

Online courses sound more difficult and self-managed, while , and SI support.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

as essential because missing class makes it hard to keep up with , and exams.

Both formats emphasize attendance or live participation, with one online review .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Students recommend her for and support, but only for those and frequent testing.

In-person recommendations are stronger and more stable, while online recommendations are more polarized by workload and teaching pace.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

She offers , similar study guides, and , but expects correct work and serious preparation.

Format shift

and review packets, while online reviews include more complaints about strictness and accuracy grading.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and exam preparation are repeatedly described as time-consuming and intense.

Format shift

Online workload is described as especially heavy, while but often seen as useful practice.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most students praise her clarity, care, and structure, but a significant minority say she rushes, skips steps, or overexplains.

Format shift

, while online reviews are more polarized and depend heavily on course and pace.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

76/100

Assessment centers on quizzes, exams, finals, practice exams, homework, and .

Format shift

Both formats are exam-oriented, with online reviews mentioning more frequent exams and recorded testing conditions.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

35 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are , and exam study guides, but warning that homework and pace are demanding.

Main concern

and practice because the class can move fast and assign a lot of work.

What students said

“ problem so well.”
MATH261

“You will NEED to commit to this class.”
MATH261

“ as the ones on her study guides”
MATH261

Remote format

Online

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are and complaints about intense workload, proctored or recorded exams, and skipped steps.

Main concern

The workload can feel like a part-time job, especially in online statistics or calculus sections.

What students said

“She has an unmatched ability to break down complex problems”
MATH245

“this class was like having a part time job.”
MATH227S

“The quizzes and but they're fairly short.”
MATH245

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because they are frequent and require studying, though practice exams and study guides make expectations clearer.

Closed Notes Quizzes And ExamsRecorded Online ExamsPractice ExamsStudy GuidesFrequent Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and one-page notes in exams, but do not clearly prove strict proctoring.

Study GuidesPractice ExamsOne Page Notes AllowedFrequent Tests

“Allows written notes in exams but only one page”
MATH227S

“Everything on the the .”
MATH261

“There were 8 hw packets, 4 quizzes, 3 exams and a final.”
MATH261

Online

Online reviews mention closed-notes quizzes and exams, recorded two-hour exams, and YuJa Verity, but do not clearly prove webcam requirements beyond recorded testing.

Closed Notes Quizzes And ExamsRecorded ExamsYuJa VerityFrequent Tests

“ ”
MATH227S

“exam every other week, 2 hours long and recorded.”
MATH227S

“The quizzes and but they're fairly short.”
MATH245

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“You will NEED to commit to this class.”
Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ problem so well.”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“Taking math 227s was like having a part time job”

⚖️ Effort And Grades

67/100

“you work hard on it you get A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

She has an unmatched ability to break down complex problems
problem so well.
and thorough.
She does not teach thoroughly and goes through the material way too quickly.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

You will NEED to commit to this class.
The effort you put into this class will reflect on your grade.
Study guides are and always very similar to the actual tests.
as the ones on her study guides

Theme 3

🧮 About Workload And Exams

.
this class was like having a part time job.
There were 8 hw packets, 4 quizzes, 3 exams and a final.
The quizzes and but they're fairly short.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews span many years, multiple math courses, both formats, and repeat consistent themes about teaching quality, workload, and exams.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 536

4 out of 53

3 out of 51

2 out of 56

1 out of 58

Course coverage

MATH26125 reviews

MATH12510 reviews

MATH2457 reviews

MATH227S6 reviews

20094E491 review

Show 1 more courses

MATH2601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

46 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 13 · A 16

B range

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

C 1

D range

No reported values

F

F 2

No letter grade reported

Drop/Withdrawal 5 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 2

Angela Chung

x x if you want strong math instruction and are ready to put in serious weekly work for the grade.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

FairEffort

Standard

Mandatory

WorthIt

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Quality

📚 Workload Reality

⚖️ Effort And Grades

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

🧮 About Workload And Exams

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

if you want strong math instruction and are ready to put in serious weekly work for the grade.