AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Myung Yun

MATH260P · MATH263 · MATH125 · MATH1073 · MATH105 · MATH261 · MATH110 · MATH262 · MATH260 · MATH270 · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
21/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
40.54%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

if you already have a strong math foundation and can , and a demanding teaching style.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderHeavy workloadTest heavyPolarizing teachingSelf-study required
  • Reviews are sharply polarized, but negative comments are frequent and , and discouraging interactions.
  • The course is intellectually hard and often requires strong algebra, trigonometry, time management, and independent study.
  • Some prepared students praise his rigor and care, but many others say to avoid him, especially in compressed online math terms.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even when some students earn A grades, they describe needing , and tolerance for tough grading.

Online reviews warn more about self-study and proctored or unexpected exams, while , and strong math foundations.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

17/100

The math content is consistently described as fast, conceptual, prerequisite-heavy, and difficult, especially in short terms.

Both formats are difficult, but online compressed sections are described as especially fast and unforgiving.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

38/100

Attendance is sometimes not mandatory, but students say missing class can quickly put you behind and .

but is important, while in-person evidence is mixed and includes one complaint that expectations changed.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recommendation is low because many students strongly warn against taking him despite a minority praising his rigor and support.

Both formats are polarizing, but online reviews contain especially , and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Many reviews call him a , and describe strict or unusual grading standards.

Format shift

Online complaints emphasize proctored exams, oral exams, and specific answer styles, while and .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and heavy pacing in short terms.

Format shift

Online short-term sections sound most overwhelming, while , and conceptual practice.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Some students praise his rigor and care, but many describe , mistakes, discouraging comments, and poor clarity.

Format shift

Positive in-person reviews emphasize examples and care, while negative online reviews emphasize and self-teaching.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews repeatedly mention quizzes, midterms, finals, tests, practice exams, and the grade.

Format shift

Online reviews mention proctored exams, oral exams, midterms, and finals, while , and practice exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are also split, with some students praising detailed examples and care while , and belittling comments.

Main concern

The main in-person concern is a demanding environment with , and inconsistent teaching clarity.

What students said

“A solid .”
MATH262
“This professor does not know what he is talking about, he is a and gives a lot of homework.”
MATH261
“Expect to work hard, daily quizzes, and .”
MATH262

Remote format

Online

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews often describe fast , and a need for self-study, with a smaller group praising his help and clear test concepts.

Main concern

The main online concern is that exams and prepare students for.

What students said

“Was extremely difficult as you would need to self study or ask many questions during the lecture to fully prepare for the .”
MATH262
“ cheating.”
MATH262
“He condenses like 3-5 lectures into 1 day and repeat that 4 times a week for a month.”
MATH260

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam style is strict because reviews mention , and severe point deductions.

Proctored ExamsRandom Oral ExamsNo CalculatorHard Midterm And FinalStrict Grading

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

exams, and no dropped lowest exam, but do not clearly prove proctoring or closed-book rules.

Daily QuizzesNo Dropped ExamPractice ExamsTest HeavyNo Clear Closed-Book Evidence
“ so make sure to study thoroughly.”
MATH262
“Expect to work hard, daily quizzes, and .”
MATH262
“review and and you'll be fine.”
MATH262

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention and finals, and strict answer-style expectations.

Proctored ExamsRandom Oral ExamsNo CalculatorHard MidtermHard FinalStrict Answer Style
“ cheating.”
MATH262
“No calculator.”
MATH262
“only for the and homework”
MATH262

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you're taking summer precalc for the first time.”

Voice snapshots generated from 37 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“ . This teacher does not teach. He just solves problems and talks to himself.”

⚖️

18/100

“ quiz, even an equal sign.”

🧮 Course Difficulty

17/100

“The course is very heavy and fast passed, specially if .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His teaching makes no sense.
  • Lots of examples are given so you are never surprised on the exams.
  • He really cares and wants to make sure no one is left behind.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Expect to work hard, daily quizzes, and .
  • , but you only need to complete what you want.
  • He condenses like 3-5 lectures into 1 day and repeat that 4 times a week for a month.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams And Grades

  • cheating.
  • so make sure to study thoroughly.
  • . . Not very lenient.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 37 reviews span many years, include both formats, and repeatedly identify the , and teaching risks.

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 519

Course coverage

MATH26214 reviews
MATH2608 reviews
MATH1255 reviews
MATH2703 reviews
MATH2612 reviews
Show 5 more courses
MATH1051 review
MATH10731 review
MATH1101 review
MATH260P1 review
MATH2631 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

34 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 3 · A 4 · A- 2

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 4

C range

1

C 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D- 1

F

3

F 3

No letter grade reported

13

Drop/Withdrawal 5 · Not sure yet 6 · Rather not say 2