Jeanine Nolan

MATH · MATH235 · MATH263 · MATH125 · STATS227 · MATH230 · MATH115 · MATH0000 · MA227 · MATH261 · MATH227 · MATH260 · STATS · 118 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 11/100
RMP rating: 1.5/5
Take again: 2.22%
Difficulty: 4.5

The decision

Avoid unless you are already strong in math and can teach yourself most of the course.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesSelf-teaching requiredHeavy homeworkTest heavyVery low recommendation

Students overwhelmingly describe the teaching as , and .
Many reviews say success requires self-teaching through textbooks, tutoring, or outside resources.
, and poor pacing create high stress and frequent withdrawals.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

14/100

Even students who earned high grades describe , and high stress.

Both formats show difficult A paths, with online and self-teaching.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

The math itself becomes much harder because , and often disconnected from homework and tests.

Online and , while in-person reviews more often mention hearing and classroom delivery problems.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Several reviews say skipping class hurts, participation matters, or help much.

Attendance pressure appears in both formats, but the first day.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students overwhelmingly because , and forced to self-teach.

Both formats are strongly negative, with no meaningful format advantage.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students repeatedly report tough grading, , and withdrawals.

Format shift

Online reviews stress late or missing grades, while and .

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

Homework is repeatedly described as .

Format shift

Both formats report heavy workload, with online reviews also noting stressful deadlines and software issues.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Most reviews say she does not explain clearly, speaks too low, rushes or drags pacing, and leaves students to teach themselves.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on disorganization and self-teaching, while , and classroom pacing issues.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

The course appears test-heavy with , and few graded items carrying major weight.

Format shift

In-person evidence explicitly mentions multiple chapter exams and a final, while and few grades.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

38 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are also highly negative, with repeated complaints about inaudible lectures, poor explanations, pacing problems, and .

Main concern

In-person students most often complain that lectures do not explain the material well enough to prepare for .

What students said

“I learned nothing.”
MATH235

“I pretty much taught myself ALL of the material.”
MATH227

“ and hard.”
125

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are highly negative, , and a need to self-teach.

Main concern

Online students risk learning little from lectures while carrying a heavy workload.

What students said

“expect to learn 98% of the material on your own”
MATH260

“LOTS of though.”
MA227

“she ”
MATH263

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

with few graded items, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules.

Test HeavyLong ExamsFew Graded ItemsFinal Exam

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person , and complicated test questions, but do not clearly prove closed-book policy.

Four Chapter ExamsFinal ExamLong Hard Tests

“They're is a total of 4 chapter exams and 1 final exam.”
MATH

“ and hard.”
125

Online

and an unreasonable Calc 3 exam, but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or proctoring policy.

Test HeavyLong Timed ExamFew Graded Items

“She would give an unreasonable amount of questions (20) on a CALC3 EXAM and say you got an hour and 10min to finish.”
MATH263

“Test heavy”
MATH227

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“ unless you're willing to make your life harder.”
Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“I pretty much taught myself ALL of the material.”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

5/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Pressure

10/100

“LOTS of though.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

She just solves problems in front of you and expects you to understand.
there was no explaining done
You cannot understand her lectures, she speaks super low

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

and hard.
she
but

Theme 3

⚠️ About Warnings

RUN
Take another professor.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

118

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 reviews across many years, and the negative themes are unusually consistent across both formats.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55

4 out of 55

3 out of 57

2 out of 518

1 out of 584

Course coverage

MATH1158 reviews

MATH2278 reviews

MATH1257 reviews

MA2275 reviews

MATH2605 reviews

Show 9 more courses

MATH2634 reviews

MATH2613 reviews

MATH2 reviews

MATH2302 reviews

MATH2352 reviews

1251 review

MATH00001 review

STATS1 review

STATS2271 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

43 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 3 · A 4

B range

B+ 3 · B 3

C range

C 2

D range

D+ 2 · D 2

F

F 1

No letter grade reported

Drop/Withdrawal 12 · Not sure yet 9 · Rather not say 2