AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Na Choi Baek

MATH235 · MATH236 · MATH125S · STAT227S · STATC1000E · MATH120 · MATH241 · MATH137 · MATH227 · MATH125 · 88 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
85.39%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take her if you want a structured and supportive math professor, but expect and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear math explanationsCaring supportHeavy notesExtra creditStrict exams
  • Most students praise her clear, organized, beginner-friendly math teaching.
  • Grades are often fair with and study guides, but students must keep up with homework and .
  • A vocal minority complains about , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

74/100

An A is very reachable with , and , but students still need consistent study for closed-note exams.

Online reviews show more explicit and study-guide support, while both formats stress that effort is required.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

, but the material can become demanding because of , and cumulative exams.

Both formats are beginner-friendly, though online reviews mention more stress around memorization and proctored tests.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Reviews imply that attending lectures and keeping up matter, but they do .

Both formats emphasize paying attention and staying current, with .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Most students strongly recommend her because , and offers tools to succeed.

Both formats are strongly recommended overall, though online has .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

, partial credit, study guides, and , but exams can still be strict and heavily weighted.

Format shift

Online reviews mention partial credit and often, while and tough grading.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Students often describe lots of , and time-consuming preparation.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize long lecture notes and , while and lecture load.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Most students , and especially helpful for people who struggle with math.

Format shift

Both online and in-person reviews strongly support high teaching quality, despite a minority of harsh complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Grades appear heavily driven by tests, finals, and and preparation.

Format shift

Online comments provide the clearest evidence of proctored and high-weight exams; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews also praise her notes, care, and structure, but , and limited flexibility.

Main concern

Students who dislike homework-heavy, test-heavy math may struggle.

What students said

“Notes are provided by her and they are very straightforward and easy to understand.”
MATH125
“No open notes for the , and be ready to print out a lot of pages.”
MATH227

Remote format

Online

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online reviews are mostly very positive, especially for , and study guides, though several warn about proctored closed-note exams.

Main concern

Some online students find the workload, memorization, and .

What students said

“She breaks everything down in a way that even little kids can understand.”
statc1000e
“ given.”
MATH235

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often closed-note and proctored, with study guides helping but not removing the memorization burden.

Closed NotesProctored ExamsCumulative FinalStudy GuidesTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews , and exams similar to reviews, but do not clearly prove webcam or online proctoring rules.

No Open NotesProctored ExamsTest HeavyExam Retakes
“No open notes for the , and be ready to print out a lot of pages.”
MATH227
“The .”
MATH227

Online

Online reviews explicitly describe , and cumulative finals.

Proctored ExamsClosed NotesScreen RecordingCumulative FinalStudy Guides
“Math215 She is a kind but tests are 90% of grade and proctored and not open note.”
MATH227
“For records you and you have to share your screen.”
MATH227

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I am the but I somehow got an A with her teaching style. She breaks everything down in a way that even little kids can understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“She breaks everything down in a way that even little kids can understand.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“If you struggle with !! ! She is a gem”

📝

34/100

“ given.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Baek makes math understandable.
  • Her lectures are fantastic and the notes really do help you understand the material she is teaching.
  • She makes math easy, understandable, and very straightforward.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • She gives loads of , partial credit on work, and really cares to help everyone!
  • This class is an EASY A if you do the most radical thing in college: study.
  • Workload is heavy!!

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • The study guide literally tells you everything.
  • , and include multiple chapters.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

88

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews across online and , heavy preparation, and exam structure.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 571
4 out of 55
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 59

Course coverage

MATH22715 reviews
MATH12514 reviews
STAT227S7 reviews
MATH2354 reviews
statc1000e3 reviews
Show 5 more courses
MATH1372 reviews
MATH2362 reviews
MATH1201 review
MATH125S1 review
MATH2411 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

46 reported outcomes

A range

20

A+ 7 · A 13

B range

14

B+ 8 · B 3 · B- 3

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

2

D 1 · D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1