AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Martin Martirossian

MATH267 · E0965 · MATH266 · MATH245 · MATH115 · MATH260 · MATH1701 · MATH261 · MATH110 · MATH227 · MATH125 · MATH227S · STATS246 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
54.55%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself and handling heavy math workload.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturesHeavy HomeworkParticipation DrivenStrict Math StyleBetter In Person
  • Recent online reviews are strongly negative, citing , poor communication, and heavy workload.
  • Older in-person reviews are mixed, with some students praising his shortcuts, patience, and willingness to help.
  • He rewards participation and effort, but his teaching style can be .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

43/100

A good grade is possible through participation, homework, and effort, but many students , and self-teaching.

, while in-person reviews show more chances through participation and easier grading in some sections.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

31/100

Math content is often made , and problems that feel unlike lectures.

Online reviews describe the content as , while but still warn weaker math students.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation is important and often tied to or success, but .

Both formats stress participation, with online Zoom reviews making participation feel more central.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

43/100

He can work for persistent students who ask questions, but because .

Online .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some students mention half credit, curved grading, , and , while others call him tough or strict.

Format shift

, while online reviews lean tougher.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Multiple reviews , and heavy effort demands.

Format shift

Online reviews show the heaviest workload complaints, while and participation.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Students are split, but recent reviews often say lectures are confusing, disorganized, hard to hear, or .

Format shift

Online teaching quality is rated worse than in-person, where some older reviews praise his patience and clarity.

Assessment method

Balanced

67/100

, and exams, with tests carrying major risk.

Format shift

Online reviews mention test-heavy pressure, while and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with some students finding him helpful and patient while .

Main concern

His shortcuts, soft voice, and strict style can confuse weaker math students.

What students said

“He grades pretty easily and does not fail students.”
MATH245
“If you are not good ”
MATH 227
“As long as you do all the .”
MATH227

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, emphasizing heavy homework, unclear Zoom lectures, weak organization, and self-teaching.

Main concern

Students often say lectures and .

What students said

“The workload is outrageous.”
MATH245
“I learned more thru TB than him; .”
1250274
“He is hard to understand and follow during his lectures”
math267

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear standard to strict because reviews cite hard or unfamiliar test problems, but proctoring and .

Test HeavyChallenging Test ProblemsExtra Credit for ParticipationHalf Credit Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and fairly easy tests when homework is completed, but no clear proof of closed-book rules.

Half Credit MentionedHomework Helps TestsTough Exams Mentioned
“ !”
MATH115
“As long as you do all the .”
MATH227
“ ”
MATH110

Online

Online reviews mention Zoom courses and difficult tests, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Challenging Test ProblemsTest HeavyZoom Mentioned
“Gives extremely challenging test problems that have never been talked about in his lectures.”
MATH245
“VERY proof-savvy, so all lectures are 98% theoretical”
1250274

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I learned more thru TB than him; .”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and online versus in-person differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“He is hard to understand and follow during his lectures”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“The workload is outrageous.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

43/100

“If you are not good ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is hard to understand and follow during his lectures
  • He teaches you tricks, which may either help or confuse.
  • He explains the reasoning behind equations, rather than encouraging you to just memorize them.

Theme 2

📈 About Effort and Grades

  • Participation is everything, ask questions, do class work, stay for lab hours and you will pass his class.
  • He grades pretty easily and does not fail students.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Online Class

  • The workload is outrageous.
  • Doesn't Title/Organize lectures.
  • I find myself teaching the material to myself.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-nine reviews across a long time span give broad evidence, with recent online reviews carrying strong negative weight.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 55
3 out of 57
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH1256 reviews
MATH2275 reviews
MATH2454 reviews
12502742 reviews
2451 review
Show 11 more courses
E09651 review
MATH 2271 review
MATH1101 review
MATH1151 review
MATH17011 review
MATH227S1 review
MATH2601 review
MATH2611 review
MATH2661 review
math2671 review
STATS2461 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 3 · A 3

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 5