AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Joseph Kazimir

MATH262 · MATH245 · MATH125 · MATH227S · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself and managing heavy math work with little communication.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor Online CommunicationSelf-Taught CourseHeavy HomeworkTest HeavyMixed In-Person Support
  • Online reviews are highly negative , and self-teaching.
  • In-person and Zoom-style reviews are more mixed, with some praise for patience, office-hour help, and .
  • Grades can still be decent, but the effort and frustration are high, especially online.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many students earned A grades, but online comments , and self-teaching.

Online grades can be achievable but frustrating, while and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Math content and tests are described as , and often unsupported online.

Online reviews make the course feel much harder because students report poor lectures and communication, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

66/100

One online review says there are no required Zoom meetings, but an as graded.

Online evidence suggests flexibility, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

The strongest pattern is non-recommendation for online sections , and self-teaching.

Online reviews are mostly negative, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

36/100

Students mention tough grading, difficult tests, few graded items, and no makeups in some online sections, though and .

Format shift

Online reviews sound stricter and less responsive, while low.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Reviews mention over 100 assignments, lots of , and a .

Format shift

Online workload is described as especially heavy, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Online students report , weak communication, and , though some in-person students praise his patience and office-hour help.

Format shift

Online teaching experience is poor, while but still mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

86/100

Reviews repeatedly mention tests, quizzes, exams, a , and .

Format shift

Both formats mention exams and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and homework but more direct help and makeup opportunities.

Main concern

Tests can be difficult and .

What students said

“ but he will give LOTS of chances if class average is low.”
MATH125
“Any and all of my questions were answered patiently and meticulously.”
MATH227S

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews mostly describe poor communication, , and .

Main concern

Students often have to teach themselves because communication and lecture support are weak.

What students said

“You will be teaching yourself, as he only provides the textbook with .”
MATH227S
“honestly the 100 assignments for math 125 online”
MATH125

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment style varies by format, with difficult and frequent tests but .

Open Note QuizzesDifficult TestsMany TestsLarge Final ExamNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention open note quizzes and , but do not clearly prove closed-book exam rules.

Open Note QuizzesDifficult TestsMakeup Finals
“ .”
MATH125
“ but he will give LOTS of chances if class average is low.”
MATH125

Online

, and no required Zoom meetings, but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Many TestsQuizzesLarge Final ExamNo Required Zoom Meetings
“His final exam was worth 750 points and every other assignment was no lower than 300 points.”
MATH227S
“ and quizzes.”
MATH245
“Completely online and no required zoom meetings.”
MATH227S

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You will be teaching yourself, as he only provides the textbook with .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting , and format differences; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Kazimir does not communicate or respond to his students.”

📚 Workload Pressure

24/100

“honestly the 100 assignments for math 125 online”

🧪

86/100

“ and quizzes.”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Experience

  • He does not respond back to emails at ALL, has no form of lectures so you literally learn NOTHING!
  • You will be teaching yourself, as he only provides the textbook with .
  • Not sure how he was before covid but his online classes are not good.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The hw can be a lot (multiple attempts) and 20+ tests.
  • but he will give LOTS of chances if class average is low.
  • Haven't learned anything but it's an easy A if you just do the quizzes.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫

  • Follows the textbook and answers questions well (even “dumb” ones).
  • Any and all of my questions were answered patiently and meticulously.
  • I would advise taking him if you are in a hurry.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 10 recent reviews give detailed but format-dependent evidence, with .

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH227S4 reviews
MATH1253 reviews
MATH2622 reviews
MATH2451 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 4

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1